From the wikipedia page on Negative Luminescence
*((My thoughts are in double brackets))*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_luminescence
Negative luminescence is a physical phenomenon by which an electronic
device emits less thermal radiation when an electric current is passed
through it
An odd thought occurs to me, taking Jones guidance of no nuclear and the
remaining portion of your statement [snip] how the SPP concentrate EMF and
project it ….. with the help of particle formation from the vacuum.[/snip] I
ponder a resonant system across spatial scales where one side of the
[snip] I suspect the energy gain comes from the vacuum during the LENR reaction,
which I currently picture as a high-velocity collision of Li-Ni-Li that
produces a MIMS reaction which also (hand-waving here) exchanges neutrons[/snip]
Bob ,
I like much of what you are saying but I think you
From: H Veeder
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_luminescence
Negative luminescence is a physical phenomenon by which an electronic device
emits less thermal radiation when an electric current is passed through it
than it does in thermal equilibrium (current off)… When viewed by a
Correction to the low IR spectra:
“British workers later demonstrated LWIR band (8-12 µm) negative luminescence
using mercury cadmium telluride diodes.”
… not sure what the difference would be at this temperature, but it could be
substantial.
From: H Veeder
RE: [Vo]:Negative Luminescence and the HotCatJones and Harry--
These ideas seem quite possible to me, particularly the phenomena of
galvanomagnetic (that's a nice term) luminescence.”
The thermocouple data is key to knowing the temperature and better calibration
of the internal temperature
This effect sounds like a form of heat pump. The energy is moved from one
location to another.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 23, 2014 2:33 am
Subject: [Vo]:Negative Luminescence and the HotCat
I doubt that this effect has anything to do with the latest ECAT measurements.
Unfortunately, it appears that measuring the spectral energy contained within
the IR range may not be directly associated with the amount of heat energy
being generated since a significant portion of the energy
For many reasons, there is major reluctance from many quarters to believe
the Calorimeter remote sensor based acquisition data provided by the 6
professors.
I suggest the use of an Air Flow Calorimeter with a computer interface
installed as a useful LENR capability to develop.
This is how it is
Air flow calorimeters are a nightmare to work with, in my experience. Air
flow calorimetry is used by HVAC installers to make sure the heating system
is okay. It works well enough for that purpose, where a 10% or 15% error
makes no difference. It does not work well enough for a scientific
This document begins:
In a document recently circulated on the Internet, collaborators of Andrea
Rossi, a convicted white-collar criminal with a string of failed energy
ventures . . .
This is an example of an extremely distorted sentence. It is so distorted
and biased, it reduces Krivit's
Interesting image of IR light being made coherent in a way suggestive of the
alumina tube
http://www.sps.ch/artikel/progresses/strongly_correlated_photons_18/
attachment: winmail.dat
The *Calorimeter as explained in the video is accurate to 0ne hundredth of
a milliwatt. When used to measure energy output of a reactor putting out
3000 watts, that provides an error tolerance of .96 accuracy.*
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
correction.
The *Calorimeter as explained in the video is accurate to a tolerance of
one hundred milliwatts. When used to measure energy output of a reactor
putting out 3000 watts, this **Calorimeter **provides .6 accuracy. *
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
I have heard that the external wires glow because heat from inside the
reactor travels down the wire by simple conduction
But perhaps energy is actively pumped into the external wires through a
process involving negative luminescence.
Harry
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:42 AM, David Roberson
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
The assumption that there is any equilibrium in the reactor and, hence,
black body radiation from it surface, is not correct IMO.
Would that be equivalent to saying the surface cannot have a steady
temperature?
It's not surprising to me that many distrust Rossi. His eccentricities and
mercurial behavior can cause many to question his intentions. Case in point:
Krivit. I noticed he copied the report over to New Energy Times and altered it
by highlighting two specific paragraphs on pages 2 and 7.
I just can't help myself! Once again I gotta comment on that photo of Rossi,
with apologies to Mats Lewan.
I propose we have some fun here. The photo desperately needs a caption.
Everybody chip in as to what they speculate Rossi was about to say. Be
creative! Might as well. Krivit wuz!
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:05 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
As Rossi has stated on many occasions, only the market can convince some
folks of reality.
Rossi could have chosen the academic route but he hasn't.
He has *decided* the market will decide and for better or worse
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Given that Levi did know of this phenomenon – and that it could be helpful in
the context of the experiment – all he needs to do is release the
thermocouple data which may not support the highest gain, but probably is
In reply to Ron Kita's message of Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:56:05 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Greetings Vortex-L.
I am not sure IF this worthy of passing this on to other
friends-researchers.
LENR...I am clueless.but
http://zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=3579
Quote:
21 matches
Mail list logo
