Jones wrote:
For the record, Fred Sparber started talking about surface plasmons in
LENR on vortex in 2006 if not before. It is a mistake to credit this to WL.
FYI:
It’s not my intent to get involved in the whole Widom-Larsen Theory
Controversy, but I think it would be disingenuous if
http://youtu.be/zMs8XwF22Dk
Bob,
Does Alan have any kind of radiation monitor operating ?
From: Bob Higgins
Also, here is the link to the periodic screen captures:
http://bit.ly/1DzPIM2
This will allow you to actually read the temperatures and pressures in the
graphs.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:05
Here is a status report on wind energy, with the total increases in 2014
and the cumulative total for different parts of the world, and different
countries.
http://www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/GWEC_Global_Wind_2014_Report_LR.pdf
China is now the world leader in wind power, with
Can anyone in this list that they know ask them to share the spreadsheet
with the raw data (including voltage so that we can compute the input
power) from time to time?
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, here is the link to the periodic screen
Jones wrote:
| Oops, as you can see the Conference was in Cambridge. (where Violante’s
2003 paper was first presented)
| Letts and Cravens also presented similar work there with lasers but
apparently did not use the phrase
| “surface plasmon”… or if they did, then maybe they are
Well, sort of. Alan has a GM counter near the setup, but it is separately
being logged, not directly tied to the same DAQ as the temperatures and
pressure. We can't even get live audio from Alan because his computer is
overloaded; so we can't hear the clicks in the audio. Though, the clicks
are
I asked if they could do this. We'll see. The problem is that Alan does
not have sufficient computer capability to continuously upload to HUGnet.
So the only one that can do this data dump is Alan. Alan says the CPU is
at the limit and he is afraid of a crash if he tries to do this. So,
Hi Mark,
Thanks for that - but here is a two year earlier reference – and one not
encumbered by the ultra-cold neutron nonsense. It is a reference which comes
from Volante at a conference presentation in 2003 at Frascati. Was Widom at
this conference? If so, we have another attribution
Oops, as you can see the Conference was in Cambridge. (where Violante’s 2003
paper was first presented) Letts and Cravens also presented similar work there
with lasers but apparently did not use the phrase “surface plasmon”… or if they
did, then maybe they are the first.
– so the $64
Dear Friends
Great positive expectations:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/04/night-of-lenr-replications.html
Let's hope they will go better than the best!
Peter
PS. and obviously, some daily news
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
BTW – this is a fabulous paper in retrospect – especially if one is of the
opinion that the dogbone type reactors – by virtue of incandescent light
interacting in the alumina tube – are storing, collating and reemitting
semi-coherent photons, as a substitute for laser irradiation. There are a
Jones wrote:
For the record, Fred Sparber started talking about surface plasmons
in LENR on vortex in 2006 if not before. It is a mistake to credit this to WL.
The original Widom Larson theory refers to electron capture. There is a
radiation
Jones--
I agree with you with the significance of the Letts Craven paper.
For a long time the laser stimulation of the Pd-D system was shown to reliably
cause excess heat. However, LC indicate in the cited paper NMR was involved
in their opinion. This was because RF stimulation also
Also, here is the link to the periodic screen captures:
http://bit.ly/1DzPIM2
This will allow you to actually read the temperatures and pressures in the
graphs.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alberto De Souza
alberto.investi...@gmail.com wrote:
http://youtu.be/zMs8XwF22Dk
15 matches
Mail list logo
