statisticd is not always the best to show something, think about
Extremistan and Mediocristan of N.N. Taleb and about the booklet
of Darrell Huff
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/11/nov-29-2015-lenr-dispute-info-with-help.html
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
I put some new videos on the playlist and added description lines about the
purpose of these experiments. Still lot of things waiting to test, one is
forcing the floating magnet spinning in opposite direction using an air jet an
see if it locks. 'counter gear-wise' coupling was possible on
There seems to be two broad schools of thought in LENR: those who believe
that LENR is catalytic and those who don’t. Peter has educated me in the
catalytic paradigm and I now join him in his thinking on nuclear catalysis.
Ed Storms is not in the catalytic school of thought. It seems to me that
There seems to be two broad schools of thought in LENR: those who believe
that LENR is catalytic and those who don’t. Peter has educated me in the
catalytic paradigm and I now join him in his thinking on nuclear catalysis.
Ed Storms is not in the catalytic school of thought. It seems to me that
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/energy-cold-fusion-antigravity-mr-frank-znidarsic-pe/1115596938?ean=9781480270237=PLA=BNB_DRS_Core+Shopping+Books_&2sid=Google_=PLGoP547_clickid=3x547
Sent from my iPad
Dear Jed,
That ENEA was not convincing enough is only a half of a statement.
As one of LENR's meta-managers. based on your long time experience
and on ENEA's own results and on everything we know it exists in the
field what would you say to Gates? I am asking for more empathy for both
Violante
Peter Gluck wrote:
> As one of LENR's meta-managers. based on your long time experience
> and on ENEA's own results and on everything we know it exists in the
> field what would you say to Gates?
>
I would say what I said in my video, which is based on papers by McKubre
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:38:41 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>It would increase the alpha-capture cross section by screening the Coulomb
>repulsion, allowing a more direct approach by the incident prompt alpha
>particle. In this thinking, tunnelling across the barrier into a
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 7:09 PM, wrote:
> As the particle gets
> closer to the target, the screening electrons get fewer, and the effect
> eventually reverses, with there being more behind the particle than in
> front of
> it.
>
Just so I am clear on what you're arguing --
I wrote:
Btw, I found evidence that samarium, rhenium and/or hafnium might have been
> present in the fuel used in the Lugano test. Each of these is an alpha
> emitter.
>
I've tried to quantify this a little more. The result can be seen here:
https://goo.gl/NiGa7u
I'm learning basic
10 matches
Mail list logo