Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:
> As one of LENR's meta-managers. based on your long time experience > and on ENEA's own results and on everything we know it exists in the > field what would you say to Gates? > I would say what I said in my video, which is based on papers by McKubre and Violante: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjvL4zNLOGw http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1618 This information should convince anyone who understands science and technology that cold fusion is real, and that it may become a practical source of energy. If you are not convinced by this, you are a scientific illiterate. > I am asking for more empathy for both Violante and Gates. > If Violante did not present a convincing case, he is at fault. If he presented the information in his papers, and in McKubre's papers, but Gates did not understand it, then Gates is an idiot. I do not see where empathy comes into it. This has nothing to do with me or my attitude toward these people. The comments by the 2004 DoE review panel show that several of the panel members were certified idiots. They may be distinguished scientists but they do not understand the first thing about science, at a grade school level. See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DOEusdepartme.pdf - Jed
