Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

2016-03-23 Thread Vibrator !
Thanks for the updates and clarifications, i'd inferred incorrectly that the samples were only suspended from below and that the reason for posting was anomolous levitation... having now watched the series on YT everything's clear. If you followed the original whipmag discussions, i concluded

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

2016-03-23 Thread Bob Cook
Re: [Vo]:Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickelFran-- The slow neutron idea is not mine, its Godes’s idea or at least as professed by his patent application: United States Patent Application 20150371723 Kind Code: A1 Abstract: A treatment of a possibly powdered, sintered, or

Re: [Vo]:Ceres, the LENR planet

2016-03-23 Thread Axil Axil
On this special day in LENR history, it’s time to step back and look at the big picture. When you are trying to find your way, it's good to know what road that you are on. The road to LENR goes through high pressure physics. This specialized field is a very difficult one because the means to

[Vo]:LENR 27th anniversary issue, not very happy but deeply optimistic

2016-03-23 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-23-2016-27-years-of-lenr-history.html The Good Years of LENR have just started, you will be amazed by what comes... on more ways. I bet! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

2016-03-23 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Bob, that’s an interesting theory.. wasn’t over abundant copper one of the anomalous Rossi claims? Fran From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:51 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

2016-03-23 Thread Bob Cook
Re: [Vo]:Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickelNi-64 + neutron = Ni-65. Ni-65 (natural decay 2.5 hr to Cu-65 via a beta – emission.) It only takes a regular H to react with a electron to form a slow neutron. Analysis of Cu isotopes (before and after) is warranted relative to

Re: [Vo]:Re: E-Cat progress

2016-03-23 Thread H LV
Another error in an ongoing comedy. I had intended the link to be this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDAeJ7eLGGg Harry On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Lennart Thornros wrote: > Jones, is it not true that none of ue here at Vortex has invested in Rossi? > If that is

Re: [Vo]:Re: E-Cat progress

2016-03-23 Thread Lennart Thornros
Jones, is it not true that none of ue here at Vortex has invested in Rossi? If that is true then we can hardly be even upset about what he says. In which way do we have the right to point finger at Rossi? Even if some of his doing and saying is incorrect and he has done that to protect his IP or

RE: [Vo]:Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

2016-03-23 Thread Stephen Cooke
I'm not sure about stimulate decay by Neutron spallation of these very stable nuclei as this would require huge energies normally associated with high energy particle collisions, (unless those energies can be reached by accumulation or resonance somehow). I guess this is your point also. I do

Re: [Vo]:Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

2016-03-23 Thread Jones Beene
HLV: "The stimulated decay of 64Ni should be accompanied by neutrons and/or radioactivity. If it decayed directly to 62Ni this would generate detectable neutrons and other radioactive isotopes. On the other hand if 64Ni decayed to 62Ni by first decaying to 63Ni, then 63Ni should be detectable