Thanks for the updates and clarifications, i'd inferred incorrectly that the samples were only suspended from below and that the reason for posting was anomolous levitation... having now watched the series on YT everything's clear.
If you followed the original whipmag discussions, i concluded that Al was cruelly playing OC (OverConfident was the original designer) - there were only two possibilities; either a hidden pulse coil or an inadvertent Orbo replication. Neos have near-infinitessimal Sv, so it seems unlikely that the relative velocity between rotor and stator was high enough to be affected by the response freqs of the magents. Others (including myself) tested identical magnet grades across wider speed ranges without detecting any anomalies. This isn't a conclusive dismissal, but the likelihood that he had a passive temporal asymmetry (the only viable means of genuine energy gain) is IMHO almost nil. Perhaps most tellingly, Al himself always denied OU, in spite of the acceleration, instead proffering nonsensical appeals to tribolectric effects, and other guff.. it is inarguable that gain occurred, he knows what energy is, so the absolute refusal to acknowedge OU can only be construed one way, as far as i'm concerned; it was a little chest-beating display to indulge his pathoskeptic humour. OC sadly became terminally ill not long after, so i hope Al did the decent thing while he still had time.. The "gearwise" and "counter-gearwise" neologisms were about his only redeeming contributions, but having established himself as a manipulative cynic i wouldn't trust a further word out of his mouth... But whatever the inspirations, you're obviously doing genuine work and taking things forward, with a neat tracking solution too! I'll have to read up on your reasearch when i get time.. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:29 AM, H Ucar <[email protected]> wrote: > This is true if diametrically polarised magnets are placed side by side as > gears. Al (of whipmag) termed this config as 'gearwise' and the case of > magnets spinning in same direction as 'counter gearwise'. He hed obtained > cgw with a composite magnet assembly apperently self running. I had > obtained cgw with two diametrically polar. magnets and I recall I reported > on vortex. But on this floating magnet setup magnets spin axes are nearly > aligned so not simply a gear like mechanism. > > >Vibrator ! Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:08:37 -0700 > > >(ETA. counterclockwise synch is interesting and also easily replicable, > at least in diametrically magnetised rotors, Again though, if this is > an axially polarised levitation then this too is anomolous. Have to > say, everything's pointing to diametric polarisation - alternatig fields, > so Earnshaw doesn't apply, but the combination of levitation > and counter-rotation is still cool.. would make for a neat executive toy..) > > Yes, I think it is cool invention too, but more interested to me the > applicability of this bound state mechanism in particle physics. See my > eariler submissions in vortex on this subject. >
