Re: [Vo]:Fundamentals of charge

2023-05-19 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
You generally start at the first approximation. The approach I do is very sound as I make sure the models are lorentz invariant. The calculations are very satisfactory and explains a lot of why's that one may have. Although the basic block is simple, as you construct the bigger structures,

Re: [Vo]:Fundamentals of charge

2023-05-19 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Stefan, All old models are ideals and simplifications. Nature is highly non linear and you certainly cannot increase the angular momentum by n*h. The reason is that after adding a quantum of energy the next resonance is slightly larger. So it looks like h(1+1)*(1+dh)^n... In mechanics you

[Vo]:Fundamentals of charge

2023-05-19 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
http://itampe.com/on-the-fundamentals-of-charge.html I must say that my intuition and back of the envelope analysis seem to pan out very nicely when I start to investigate math more seriously. It all fit very well, actually a very satisfying result and this will make the foundations of Mills

Re: [Vo]:AI Invited to Bilderberg

2023-05-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
I thought for a moment this meant they invited an AI ChatBot to address the Bilderberg meeting. That would be a good article for The Onion. - Jed