[Vo]:'bad science'

2011-10-24 Thread Harry Veeder
The witty remarks on 'bad science' are worth reading in this welcome message to ICCF 17. http://www.iccf17.org/sub01.php (The message is an image file so I could not copy and past it) Harry

Re: [Vo]:'bad science'

2011-10-24 Thread Dr Josef Karthauser
On 24 Oct 2011, at 07:58, Harry Veeder wrote: The witty remarks on 'bad science' are worth reading in this welcome message to ICCF 17. http://www.iccf17.org/sub01.php (The message is an image file so I could not copy and past it) Why on earth did they do that? I guess that they don't

Re: [Vo]:'bad science'

2011-10-24 Thread peter . heckert
: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 24.10.2011 08:58 Betreff: [Vo]:'bad science' The witty remarks on 'bad science' are worth reading in this welcome message to ICCF 17. http://www.iccf17.org/sub01.php (The message is an image file so I could not copy

Re: [Vo]:'bad science'

2011-10-24 Thread Craig Haynie
It was bad science when alchemists where trying to make gold, and claim they can do this, claim they have done this, claim they will soon be able to do this, taking money for this research, selling it, fighting other reasonable theories like those of Lavoisier and others when they had

Re: Re: [Vo]:'bad science'

2011-10-24 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 24.10.2011 12:21 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:'bad science' It was bad science when alchemists where trying to make gold, and claim they can do this, claim they have done this, claim