The witty remarks on 'bad science' are worth reading in this welcome
message to ICCF 17.
http://www.iccf17.org/sub01.php
(The message is an image file so I could not copy and past it)
Harry
On 24 Oct 2011, at 07:58, Harry Veeder wrote:
The witty remarks on 'bad science' are worth reading in this welcome
message to ICCF 17.
http://www.iccf17.org/sub01.php
(The message is an image file so I could not copy and past it)
Why on earth did they do that? I guess that they don't
: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 24.10.2011 08:58
Betreff: [Vo]:'bad science'
The witty remarks on 'bad science' are worth reading in this welcome
message to ICCF 17.
http://www.iccf17.org/sub01.php
(The message is an image file so I could not copy
It was bad science when alchemists where trying to make gold, and claim they
can do this, claim they have done this, claim they will soon be able to do
this, taking money for this research, selling it, fighting other reasonable
theories like those of Lavoisier and others when they had
- Original Nachricht
Von: Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 24.10.2011 12:21
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:'bad science'
It was bad science when alchemists where trying to make gold, and claim
they can do this, claim they have done this, claim
5 matches
Mail list logo