It is apparent that a lot of energy is required to initiate the nuclear
reaction in ECAT type devices. This problem is always a sticking point for the
skeptical point of view and certainly makes the process seem less likely to
most of us in the other camp. I proposed the possibility of
Could this theory explain why e-cat works only at exactly 44.50N, 11.40E (
Via dell'Elettricista,
6http://maps.google.it/maps/place?ftid=0x477e2c9d8f052653:0xbb01c2caaede9d3bq=44.503798,11.402594ved=0CA4Q-gswAAsa=Xei=XyHdTs3zLubRmAWdv_DoBwsig2=MSCvhxqFZtuv5lrCZrt8zw40138
Bologna Italy) and A.R.
Andrea Selva andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Could this theory explain why e-cat works only at exactly 44.50N, 11.40E (
Via dell'Elettricista,
Triggered by Cosmic Rays?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Andrea Selva andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Could this theory explain why e-cat works only at exactly 44.50N, 11.40E (
Via dell'Elettricista,
6http://maps.google.it/maps/place?ftid=0x477e2c9d8f052653:0xbb01c2caaede9d3bq
At 12:24 PM 12/5/2011, Andrea Selva wrote:
Sorry Jed. I apologize for the quite rude joke. Couldn't resist.
I still think that the eCat's neutrinos are interfering with the
LHC's tachyonic neutrino experiment. Or vice-versa. Did you notice
that Rossi always lines up the eCats in the same
It seems to me that a universal theme in “cold fusion” is a triggering
mechanism that releases stored potential energy.
In all cases, a “cold fusion” system is a system that is heavily coherent
in a quantum mechanical(QM) sense.
Potential energy builds up and is stored by these coherent atoms.
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:46:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
When one of these coherent atoms becomes QM decoherent and leaves the QM
assemblage through the action of a trigger, it releases this potential
energy over the entire QM assemblage.
Surely the energy of any one atom
Andrea Selva andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way I missed this McKubre test in US. Can you tell me more and
provide some pointers ?
See:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg58130.html
- Jed
in a small
local? Perhaps we need to find a method that does not require that amount of
cooperation.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 5, 2011 3:46 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT Triggered by Cosmic Rays?
It seems
I speculate that when a coherent proton who is a member of a large coherent
ensemble of protons penetrates the nucleus of a nickel atom, this nickel
atom will retain the energy of the nuclear reaction as potential energy.
When a thermal phonon that propagates in the nickel lattice perturbs this
--
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/12/5
Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT Triggered by Cosmic Rays?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Andrea Selva andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Could this theory explain why e-cat works only at exactly 44.50N, 11.40E (
Via dell'Elettricista,
6http
that
amount of cooperation.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 5, 2011 3:46 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT Triggered by Cosmic Rays?
It seems to me that a universal theme in “cold fusion” is a triggering
mechanism
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/12/5
Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT Triggered by Cosmic Rays?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Andrea Selva andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Could this theory explain why e-cat works only at exactly 44.50N
On Dec 5, 2011, at 10:14 AM, David Roberson wrote:
It is apparent that a lot of energy is required to initiate the
nuclear reaction in ECAT type devices. This problem is always a
sticking point for the skeptical point of view and certainly makes
the process seem less likely to most of us
14 matches
Mail list logo
