More...
http://vimeo.com/27247968
This simulation depicts a exploding star that produces load of magnetic
field lines that can disrupt the surface of the exploding star.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an assumption that energy is transferred from
More...
here is another very good simulation of magnetic effects in a supernova
http://www.space.com/25771-big-bang-universe-supernova-simulations.html
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
More...
http://vimeo.com/27247968
This simulation depicts a
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 3 Jul 2014 02:21:34 -0400:
Hi,
...but it's the light that we are measuring, so affects that delay the
propagation of light are significant.
More...
here is another very good simulation of magnetic effects in a supernova
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 1 Jul 2014 21:23:03 -0700:
Hi,
That the estimates for the time taken in the Sun vary between 1 17
years, then this tells me that such estimates are not on a very sound footing.
If the difference is a factor of 17 for a constant star like the
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:39 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
That the estimates for the time taken in the Sun vary between 1 17
years, then this tells me that such estimates are not on a very sound
footing.
If the difference is a factor of 17 for a constant star like the Sun, then
I'm
There is an assumption that energy is transferred from the core of the sun
to the surface via photons. This is most likely not true.
Magnetic field lines may well move most of the energy from inside the sun
to the surface where it excites the corona to very high temperatures in the
millions of
guess).
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 7:15 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
Consider the following: Light could be considered the passing of
electromagnetic fields through space. Certainly
the
star is measured in seconds instead of hours.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 1, 2014 1:22 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
In reply to Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.'s message of Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:30
microseconds?)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 1, 2014 2:05 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
The time delay is anticipated as follows:
SN 1987A was first observed in February, 1987 when it baffled
In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:11:05 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Of course we have data comparing nearby super nova explosions to those of
distant ones. I do not recall anyone finding the delay in relation to the
nearby ones. The other issue to consider is that these
In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:11:05 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
BTW there may also have been also have been other external gas/dust/plasma
clouds between the us and the explosion.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
the neutrino event lasts since that
would imply how long the star remains intact.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 1, 2014 4:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue
hours along the
way. :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 1, 2014 4:57 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:11:05 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
BTW
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:51 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
The delay is caused by the photons trying to fight their way through the
plasma
and gas. Even after the explosion has taken place, some of them still have
to
fight their way through the expanding plasma cloud ...
Note also that in a
this difference in behavior cause the light to slow down relative to the
neutrinos?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Jun 29, 2014 10:13 pm
Subject: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
To really understand LENR, we must
Interesting idea.
Would light just being absorbed in dust then re-emitted cause a delay ( highly
dispersive, though, I'd guess).
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 7:15 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
Consider
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
Interesting idea.
Would light just being absorbed in dust then re-emitted cause a delay ( highly
dispersive, though, I'd guess).
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 7:15 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject
: Monday, June 30, 2014 7:15 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum
Consider the following: Light could be considered the passing of
electromagnetic fields through space. Certainly the wavelength gets much
larger as the frequency of the emission approaches zero Hertz
To really understand LENR, we must really understand how the vacuum works.
There is a new pile of dots involved in this effort that must be strung
together before a coherent picture of the vacuum can take shape.
It seems that the vacuum takes its behavior from what is flowing in it.
This is what
19 matches
Mail list logo
