.
P.S. I don't post much, but I do enjoy and follow this group closely.
C. Michael Crosiar
--- On Wed, 5/21/08, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Vo]:Chlorine photo-reactivity
To: vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008, 10
--- Michael Crosiar wrote:
I've been thinking about this since you posted about
a month ago. How photo photo-sensitive is chlorine
in the UV range? One of the problems mills has is
getting enough mono-atomic hydrogen for his
catalytic reaction. I'm thinking the HCl serves
another much
A couple of thoughts on a putative 'warm fusion'
mechanism:
BTW this capture notion is very similar to that
proposed by Ed Storms.
1) Given the small, but proven, fusion rate of warm
fusion - i.e. the Farnsworth Fusor, where the
apparent threshold for fusion has been lowered from
several MeV
Here is a pale green musing on a possible route to
overunity based on a reappraisal of Mills' CQM.
[pale green as in the color of chlorine]
Subtitled: waste-to-wonderful
FACT: High resolution photoabsorption spectra of
hydrogen chloride gas (HCl) have measured the chlorine
K edge in the
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 21 May 2008 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
It so happens that - in a warped variation of Mills
CQM hypothesis - this value ~2830 eV corresponds to a
shrinkage level of 104. That is:
104 x 27.2 = ~2829 eV
I'm not quite sure what you mean by this, but
--- Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Hence 2830 eV would correspond to a p value of about
14 not 104
...right you are - in Mills accounting. I was using
the Hartree energy in the way that Arie de Geuss
proposes, but that is mixing of metaphors, so to
speak, and is my mistake ...
6 matches
Mail list logo
