In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Fri, 14 May 2010 08:15:38 -0400:
Hi Fran,
[snip]
Hi Robin,
I take it Jones forwarded my email to Professor Hagelstein to you - too
much of a coincidence we both wrote him so close together. I like your
hypothesis it is a doable scenario.
: Friday, May 14, 2010 12:31 AM
To: p...@mit.edu
Subject: [Vo]:Constraints on energetic particles in the Fleischmann-Pons
experiment
Dear Professor,
Having just read your paper, I wonder if you have considered the possibility
that the energy is carried away by fast electron rather than alpha
Nada. I don't believe in coincidence in general (in the sense of
completely random) nor do I forward private mail - but an expected kind of
synchronicity can happen when many people are focusing on the same
phenomenon.
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X
Hi Robin,
I
[mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 8:47 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Constraints on energetic particles in the Fleischmann-Pons
experiment
Nada. I don't believe in coincidence in general (in the sense of
completely random) nor do I forward private mail
At 12:30 AM 5/14/2010, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Such a possibility arises from the notion that the fusion reaction may be
triggered through any of the various shrunken hydrogen concepts,
in which case
the proximity of the electron to the nucleus may make absorption of the fusion
energy
Dear Professor,
Having just read your paper, I wonder if you have considered the possibility
that the energy is carried away by fast electron rather than alpha particles.
These would undoubtedly create X-rays, however in aqueous experiments most of
the electrons may well be absorbed in the
6 matches
Mail list logo
