Re: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

2016-04-10 Thread Sean True
lto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net] > Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 10:13 AM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent? > > Russ George, > Jones Beene wrote. "since the evidence does not support that (crimes were > committed) yet." > But he is

RE: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

2016-04-10 Thread Russ George
posting lies, distortions and hate here in the Vortex. -Original Message- From: a.ashfield [mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net] Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 10:13 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent? Russ George, Jones Beene wrote. "since the evidence

RE: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

2016-04-10 Thread a.ashfield
Russ George, Jones Beene wrote. "since the evidence does not support that (crimes were committed) yet." But he is the most vociferous one in libeling Rossi and his supporters. Why they can't wait for evidence like the ERV's report and other actual facts suggests some emotional problem or

RE: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

2016-04-10 Thread Russ George
, April 10, 2016 9:29 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent? I agree with Craig. My reading of the the Agreement is the same as his. Therefore, I have guessed at some new unforeseen situation that IH thinks would make the agreement moot, such as a Government Order

Re: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

2016-04-10 Thread Bob Cook
Message- From: Craig Haynie Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 5:41 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent? If Industrial Heat says that the reactor doesn't work, then why did they apply for a patent with Rossi's technology? https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf

Re: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

2016-04-10 Thread Jack Cole
This is another silly argument used by Rossi to cast himself as the victim. That patent was filed for on 2/20/15. It took IH awhile to a) figure out that the previous results were questionable, and b) attempt to replicate with better methodology. It also took time for the results of other

Re: [Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

2016-04-10 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
Patents are far more complicated than just work/don't work. Just because some claim in some patent might actually work, doesn't necessarily mean the whole things works. That claim is still useful and IH was paying for the R On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Craig Haynie

[Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

2016-04-10 Thread Craig Haynie
If Industrial Heat says that the reactor doesn't work, then why did they apply for a patent with Rossi's technology? https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2015127263=1==PCT+Biblio https://www.google.com/patents/WO2015127263A3?cl=en Rossi is now saying that they have