On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> James Bowery wrote:
>
>
>> I doubt that an economic or structural panacea exists.
>>>
>>
>> Of course not.
>>
>> However, to throw your hands up and say that no economic or structural
>> modifications are worth while is a bit too defeatist f
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> James Bowery wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I doubt that an economic or structural panacea exists.
>>
>>
>> Of course not.
>>
>> However, to throw your hands up and say that no economic or structural
>> modifications are worth while is a bit too defeatist
James Bowery wrote:
> I doubt that an economic or structural panacea exists.
>>
>
> Of course not.
>
> However, to throw your hands up and say that no economic or structural
> modifications are worth while is a bit too defeatist for my taste.
>
Not true. I favor incremental changes. A little tw
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> James Bowery wrote:
>
>
>> That's why I concluded, in 1992 when this all occurred (on top of the
>> problems with NASA basically thumbing their collective noses at the Launch
>> Services Purchase Act of 1990) the only way to attack
>> bureau
James Bowery wrote:
> That's why I concluded, in 1992 when this all occurred (on top of the
> problems with NASA basically thumbing their collective noses at the Launch
> Services Purchase Act of 1990) the only way to attack
> bureaucratic intransigence in both the private as well as public sect
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:02 PM, James Bowery wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
>> I am not being cynical. That's the way the world works. Almost all of it.
>> The only reason some corporations deviate from that pattern is because they
>> love money more than politic
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I am not being cynical. That's the way the world works. Almost all of it.
> The only reason some corporations deviate from that pattern is because they
> love money more than politics.
>
That's why I concluded, in 1992 when this all occurred
James Bowery wrote:
> The next year, when the money was supposed to become available, NASA HQ
> punished NASA Ames for going over their head (even though it was a
> grassroots organization chaired by yours truly) by reducing the
> discretionary budget for NASA Ames by an amount equal to the earm
Another route McKubre raised was direct political action to get funding
earmarked so as to bypass the bureaucratic pecking order.
I tried that with R. T. Jones' oblique all wing design and it backfired.
What happened was I visited Jones at his home in the hills above Silicon
Valley around the tim
At about 10 minutes into the interview, the question that is most relevant
crops up, which is how can one overcome the block on scientific
publication. This is most relevant because it gets to the heart science
itself, and the institutional incompetence currently besetting science.
Yes, I think t
This link to the audio works:
http://www.mevio.com/episode/318736/fen.120828
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
>
> http://m.podshow.com/media/1049/episodes/318736/pesn-318736-08-29-2012.mp3Interview>
>
> Listen
>
> On August 28, Sterling Allan conducted an interview with Michael
http://media.podshow.com/media/1049/episodes/318736/pesn-318736-08-29-2012.mp3
Is a dead link.
Moreover, the link you provided was in error syntactically:
http://m.podshow.com/media/1049/episodes/318736/pesn-318736-08-29-2012.mp3Interview
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo