In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:37:31 -0800:
Hi,
This makes more sense. I was under the impression that the info on He not
matching the heat output was a whole experiment measurement rather than
samples taken over time. What was the source of this particular piece of
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:01:18 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Maybe I am not explaining it well, but it makes sense to me, so far. It is
essentially equating the strong magnetic alignment you mention as providing
the same effect as ultracold - IF and only if there is a group of
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:20:59 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Stated simply, much of the expected excess energy was already given up prior
to the actual nuclear reaction, via the non-nuclear shrinkage reaction
which pushed it below ground state, giving up heat in the form of UV
Hi Robin,
JB: Stated simply, much of the expected excess energy was already given up
prior
to the actual nuclear reaction, via the non-nuclear shrinkage reaction
which pushed it below ground state, giving up heat in the form of UV
radiation.
That is the part that BLP got right wrt hydrogen, and
One curious fact emerges from a close reading of the many Arata papers
relative to what he labels as pycnodeuterium.
I have never seen this explicitly mentioned in a connect-the-dots fashion,
but if it has been put forward by someone else, please let me know the
citation so that proper credit
5 matches
Mail list logo
