Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

2011-02-11 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: > I think an end should be put to the con-fusion, Hear here! :-) T

Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

2011-02-11 Thread Harry Veeder
> >From: Horace Heffner >To: Vortex-L >Sent: Fri, February 11, 2011 1:54:00 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results >I think the notion of super heavy electrons suppressing gammas and other >neuron >activation radiation, especially de

Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

2011-02-11 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 10, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Harry Veeder wrote: The theory is the helium is the end of a sequence of fissions initiated by palladium nuclei absorbing neutrons. (end quote of Harry Veeder, Jed continues ...) Ah. I see. And I gather it involves lithium as well. Does

Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

2011-02-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Harry Veeder wrote: The theory is the helium is the end of a sequence of fissions initiated > by palladium nuclei absorbing neutrons. > Ah. I see. And I gather it involves lithium as well. Does it consume deuterium and produce helium at the same rate as DD fusion would? I guess the lithium deple

Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

2011-02-10 Thread Harry Veeder
The theory is the helium is the end of a sequence of fissions initiated by palladium nuclei absorbing neutrons. harry > >From: Jed Rothwell >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 12:15:12 PM >Subject: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his res

Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

2011-02-10 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Jones ... > This field cannot be simplified into an either/or situation. > > Ockham has no place in this field – LENR it is inherently > complex. > > Krivit and his sponsors are half-right (but half-wrong), > as is anyone who says that LENR is pure fusion and nothing > else. > > There are c

RE: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

2011-02-10 Thread Jones Beene
s on this. Jones From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:15 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results This is exceptionally weird, even for Steve Krivit: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/

[Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

2011-02-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
This is exceptionally weird, even for Steve Krivit: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/02/07/missing-cold-fusion-from-new-energy-times/ I posted a note here mentioning that the best evidence for helium is the work of Melvin Miles. Krivit said that "New Energy Times has found Melvin Miles’ report