On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
We know that the ERV test director is a person with long years of
> experience in the nuclear industry.
>
Do you have a link to more information about this?
Eric
I wrote:
> If there is radiation obviously it will need many more years to establish
> the exact nature of the radiation, to develop a theory, and to have the
> theory checked and accepted by the majority of physicists so that we can be
> sure the radiation is controlled or fully prevented in a c
Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi knows that his reactor can produce radiation. He has taken steps to
> reduce of eliminate that radiation.
>
Yes. I know. Assuming he is right about that, then what you said previously
makes no sense. You said: "Rossi would have no way to predict that his
technology is radi
Rossi knows that his reactor can produce radiation. He has taken steps to
reduce of eliminate that radiation.
Your the person who said that Rossi's reactor needed to be tested for years
to see if it produced radiation. The FDA has product rules for radiation
production produced over a time period.
Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi would have no way to predict that his technology is radiation free.
> This is his reason for the F9 response in terms of the ERV test. If any
> radiation is seen coming out of the X-Cat, that would put Rossi in a very
> difficult spot with NRC and FDA regulation and licensi
It seems to me if the measure of success is the production of excess heat
that Rossi would surly know how the ERV yearlong test went. But the
criteria for successfully passing the 1 year test may not be COP but the
production of ionizing radiation or the lack of it. Rossi has spent many
years in b
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-27-2016-lenrs-past-can-help-its.html
It was not easy but I succeed to get info and to compose a blog issue
today too.
all the best to you, friends!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
7 matches
Mail list logo
