have
been ruled out by experiment. Probably ruled out only by theory.
By the way what does AFAIK stand for?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:My current views on the 'Rossi's process
Bob, et.al.:
AFAIK = As Far As I Know
-mark
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
By the way what does AFAIK stand for?
Bob
I should have guessed.
Thanks Mark and Robin. You can tell I am an old timer.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: MarkI-Zeropoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:My current views on the 'Rossi's process'
Bob, et.al
AFAIK stand for?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:My current views on the 'Rossi's process'
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:19:14 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Your
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:19:14 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Your description is exactly as I understand it. The random walk is not very
long however, since it probably occurs at the first electron it attracts and
that is pretty quick after the nucleus gives it up.
AFAIK
I lost that data in my memory indeed. Thanks for refreshing it.
Do you have a public reference on fusion of odd count nuleons not fusing?
I respect your knowledge but like to understand this a bit better.
It looks like there are many variaties possible.
Looks like much is depending on what
Eric, on the little info I could find in public domain, I understand that
ß+ decay happens within the nucleus.
Are you saying that there are quite some exceptions?
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Teslaalset
:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:My current views on the 'Rossi's process'
Eric, on the little info I could find in public domain, I understand that ß+
decay happens within the nucleus.
Are you saying that there are quite some exceptions?
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Eric Walker
, March 21, 2014 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:My current views on the 'Rossi's process'
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.. The ß+ decay energy of Cu(x) Ni(x) + e+ + ve (2 -4 MeV) of each
decay step in the chain, causing the Ni/Cu powder
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
Eric, on the little info I could find in public domain, I understand that
ß+ decay happens within the nucleus.
Are you saying that there are quite some exceptions?
Perhaps Robin or Bob can correct me if I'm wrong,
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:My current views on the 'Rossi's process'
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Eric, on the little info I could find in public domain, I understand that
ß+ decay happens within the nucleus
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Until they get to real low energies they mostly move in a straight line.
Thus even shielding will not destroy the coincident events that detectors
will record.
Interesting; I didn't realize that. Somewhere I got the
3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:My current views on the 'Rossi's process'
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Until they get to real low energies they mostly move in a straight line.
Thus even shielding will not destroy the coincident events
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
1. The ß+ decay energy of Cu(x) Ni(x) + e+ + ve (2 -4 MeV) of each
decay step in the chain, causing the Ni/Cu powder to heat up.
I think the electron-positron annihilation photons from the radioactive
decay
I've been reading quite some theories and views on what exactly Rossi's /
Defkalion's processes might be.
Here's my current view focussing on the main effects only. Comments and
(dis)agreements are welcome:
The main chain of fusions/transmutations is in my view: Ni58+p Cu59 + e-
Ni59 +p Cu60 +
You should take a look at the table 2 and table 3 element list from the DGT
ICCF-17 document.
http://cdn.coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/2012-08-13-ICCF-17__Paper_DGTGx.pdf
The is a large increase in very light elements and not much nickel to
copper transmutation.
This means that
What would be the testable predictions of your theory? What should we be
looking for when someone tests a device and publishes data about it?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
I've been reading quite some theories and views on what exactly Rossi's /
That sorta goes to my point about looking for experimental results that
either lend support or reduce support for a particular theory. I'm
noticing that a lot of the experiments are veering towards testing nuclear
products, which is going to be expensive. It won't matter much if Rossi is
selling
18 matches
Mail list logo
