Dear Vortex-L readers:
Because this is my first post to this group I would like to introduce
myself. My background is in communications, electrical engineering,
systems theory, systems engineering, software architecture/engineering,
and system integration. I got my degree (Dr.-Ing., a Doctorate
the beginning discourse on science and pseudo science, look like the
reflexion of Benoit Rittaud in french skeptic book le mythe climatique.
he says that young science begin with merged science and pseudo science,
then expulse it like astronomy expulsed astrology.
me I prefer the theory of
Alain Sepeda,
### sorry for the syntactically/orthographically garbled reply ###
this is a hopefully cleaned one:
---
Von: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 17:58 Freitag, 30.März 2012
Betreff:
Re: [Vo]:New global warming curves show
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
The temperature have not increased since 13 years, and they succeed in
pretending it is accelerating (I imagine they use convenient averaging).
Comment on Ice seems to ignore recent analysis that couple the melting
Not good. See:
thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/03/24/451239/manmade-climate-change-accelerated-in-2001-2010-world-meteorological-organization-reports
This came to my attention because someone linked a response to
LENR-CANR.org.
- Jed
Oh dear, Joe Romm again torturing the numbers until they confess.
That graph employs the most advantageous manipulation available (a 10
year running average) to hide the fact that if you fit a line through
the recent temperature record you have to go back more than a decade
to show any warming
Beware of consensus in science. Bad memory.
I hesitate between moaning and laughing.
and funnily after a period of careful neutrality WMO seems to enter, late,
the club of pathologic consensus...
The temperature have not increased since 13 years, and they succeed in
pretending it is accelerating
7 matches
Mail list logo
