Re: [Vo]:RE:The APPEARANCE of "In your face" type attitude

2011-05-02 Thread noone noone
. Scott Smith To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 12:26:32 PM Subject: [Vo]:RE:The APPEARANCE of "In your face" type attitude When we say "Cold Fusion" they are almost justified in assuming that it should work the same way as hot fusion. We will get much further wit

Re: [Vo]:RE:The APPEARANCE of "In your face" type attitude

2011-05-02 Thread Michele Comitini
prof. Focardi in a recent interview asserted that "Cold Fusion" was a name sticked by "hot fusionists" in scorn of LENR research. Of course there is a chance that he was just joking. mic 2011/5/2 Jed Rothwell : > Wm. Scott Smith wrote: >> >> When we say "Cold Fusion" they are almost justified i

Re: [Vo]:RE:The APPEARANCE of "In your face" type attitude

2011-05-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
Wm. Scott Smith wrote: When we say "Cold Fusion" they are almost justified in assuming that it > should work the same way as hot fusion. > No one picked the name "cold fusion." It just came along. F&P did not like it. Researchers have often gather to pick another name, such as LENR. See p. iv h

[Vo]:RE:The APPEARANCE of "In your face" type attitude

2011-05-02 Thread Wm. Scott Smith
When we say "Cold Fusion" they are almost justified in assuming that it should work the same way as hot fusion. We will get much further with more people if we emphasize that "something" is new and different, and can THEY explain THAT. If we get them thinking enough to come up with something