surprise or big dud ?
Yes, we need to rig the MFMP “Mouse Trap” to see lower in energy and resolve it:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0305310
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?
This is conceptually what we
Yes, we need to rig the MFMP “Mouse Trap” to see lower in energy and resolve it:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0305310
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?
This is conceptually what we are thinking
: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?
Great find Axil.
Did you already forward it to MFMP?
It's interesting that they use Boron as a neutron shield too. That might be
important for them to know too.
On 25 Feb 2016, at 05:25, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://newenergytimes.
rgy region.
For those trying to follow Figure 3, the curves are mislabeled in the
key/legend. The lowest plot is the subtracted one.
- Mark Jurich
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:58 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?
From: Axil Axil
h
ric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:58 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: Big surprise or big dud ?
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Mark Jurich <jur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> The Geiger Counter
the
disappointment of many about what was done with the
announcements here. All I can say is, “Hang in there.” We are ... We’re not
finished with this yet and there’s more to come.
- Mark Jurich
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:58 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Big
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Mark Jurich wrote:
The Geiger Counter was essentially brain dead during this part of the run
> and also with a post Ba calibration on the low end... The detected
> radiation wasn’t shown to be sourced from the active cell.
I am a big fan of
this down in the next run, which most
likely will be a pure replication attempt, but a better mouse trap to catch
this mouse.
- Mark Jurich
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Big surprise or big dud ?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Mark Jurich wrote:
Right now, we are working on beefing up the Geiger Counting Sensitivity,
> Coincidence Detection and obtaining another detector to confirm. It’s only
> one instrument, we need another to confirm. Temporary High Voltage
>
Folks, it is true that Bob G might have overhyped this, but you have to realize
the number of years he has devoted to this and the
knowledge he has acquired over those years. I do not blame him for doing it.
Yes, the Spectrum Result has to be verified/replicated. We (Team MFMP) did not
see
10 matches
Mail list logo