On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Do you have a reference to this statement
> ;
> " created by minute flakes of cathode material "
>
Myself. (It was just speculation.)
> The exotic particle that was assumed by this investigator was the
> poly-neutron
>
I know. My hunch is th
The material that escaped from the reactor was LENR active. A rubber O-ring
that absorbed this LENR active material shows LENR reactions when placed on
the CR-39.
Do you have a reference to this statement
;
" created by minute flakes of cathode material "
The exotic particle that was assumed by t
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Russ George wrote:
Clearly they have been observed in Fisher/Orianni work and produced large
> showers of radiation.
An interpretation of the Oriani work that does not involve exotic particles
is that the pits in the CR-39 chips were created by minute flakes of
From: Mark Jurich
* If another scintillator is secured, it is quite possible to run it
without immediate lead surrounding it, but it will be close to the Lead Cave,
I’m afraid (within a couple feet away, tops).
Mark - Being close with an unshielded unit will convey far more relevant
i
travel
ample distances to reach the detector.
From: Mark Jurich [mailto:jur...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:06 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Bremsstrahlung radiation
The Lead Cave must be nearby (with the scintillator in it) to replicate. If
another
RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiationThe Lead Cave must be nearby (with the
scintillator in it) to replicate. If another scintillator
is secured, it is quite possible to run it without immediate lead surrounding
it, but it will be close to the Lead Cave, I’m afraid
(within a couple feet away, tops
You can get a idea about that by considering how much power is required to
sinter a pile of 5 micron nickel particles that were welded together by a
rare earth doped tungsten rod and a sintered 100 micron nickel particle was
produced. Some of that rod vaporized and coated the surface of the 100
mic
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
>>
>>
>> In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to check for gamma/xray
>> emissions at more than 50 cm from the reactor. (see Appendix 1)
>> http://amsacta.unibo.it/4084/1/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf
>> I don't understand all the jargon but over the
>
>
>
> In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to check for gamma/xray
> emissions at more than 50 cm from the reactor. (see Appendix 1)
> http://amsacta.unibo.it/4084/1/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf
> I don't understand all the jargon but over the 32 day duration test it
> looks like the dosimeters didn
Here's a top view of the NaI Scintillator Head and the reactor/cell, with
rulers (courtesy of Alan):
http://tempid.altervista.org/GS5-2_test_setup2.jpg
The [Detector/Lead Cave] are on a separate, heavy duty cart which may be rolled
back if things get too hot or for repositioning.
- Mark Juric
Hi Harry:
The radiation level detected in the MFMP Reactor is very low. The Geiger Counter on the setup apparently did not detect it. The
current calc/estimate shows the dosage was comparable (in some ways) to way less than a panoramic dental X-ray, anywhere over a
total dosage period of fro
11 matches
Mail list logo
