multiple stages with variable spacing could enhance the changes measured.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X (US)
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 7:42 AM
To: 'vortex-l@eskimo.com' <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
Bob yo
-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
Bob you said the light entering the field would regain its original
characteristics upon exiting - which I agree with but it does suggest some
interesting experiments of a different nature, shaped and nested fields
]
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
Robin--
My comment was intended to apply to the local point in space that the light
ply the effect.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 11:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
That sounds like a good experiment.
Bob Cook
-Original Mes
effected by the magnetic
field IMHO.
Bob Cook
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 1:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:35:08 -0800:
Hi
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:21:38 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Light entering the intense magnetic field would regain its original
>characteristic upon exiting the field. However, if your eyes were also in
>the magnetic field they would sense the changes effected by the
That sounds like a good experiment.
Bob Cook
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 7:50 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:21:38 -0800
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:35:08 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>My thought was that a strong magnetic field may disrupt the oscillating nature
>of the lightdisturbanceas it passes through the magnetic field, changing its
>frequency and or intensity and direction of propagation.
What happens to a photon in a strong magnetic field is solved by classical
(Maxwell,s) theory I believe. Axil’s ENP’s may be nothing more that strong
magnetic lines of force. Such lines of force may be enhanced by ferromagnetic
material and/or directed in certain directions in Rossi’s
Fran--
Thanks for that nice description of the effects of 5D space. Do you have a
reference to Calvert’s ideas?
Does the theory have any parameter(s) associated with the 5th dimension that
are akin to those in 4D space-time? It seems that 5th D may have a metric like
dB/dz where B is the
I think the statement, "What happens to a photon in a strong magnetic field
is solved by classical (Maxwell,s) theory I believe." is probably only
correct only in the part that you believe it. No one really knows what a
photon is (try to find some good scholarly articles on what a photon IS),
so
: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
I think the statement, "What happens to a photon in a strong magnetic field is
solved by classical (Maxwell,s) theory I believe." is probably only correct
only in the part that you believe it. No one really knows what a photon is
(t
Hank Mills
December 29th, 2013 at 2:34 PM
Dear Andrea,
The information you are sharing is facinating. While we wait for the full
reports, it gives us something to think upon.
1 – If the mouse over stimulates the cat so it runs around in circles
continually, not going back to sleep, does the cat
Dave--
The number 16 may come from the Artists rendition of a reactor. I could find
no specific Rossi statement regarding the picture included in the E-Cat World
item identified by Axil as the basis for his comment. Axil’s interpretations
of what he reads and sees in various items can make
;vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wed, Dec 2, 2015 5:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
Hank Mills
December 29th, 2013 at 2:34 PM
Dear Andrea,
The information you are sharing is facinating. While we wait for the full
reports, it gives us something to think upon.
1 –
d we use? The patent seems to
> be the best indication of his actual intentions.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Wed, Dec 2, 2015 5:52 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Wed, Dec 2, 2015 5:52 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR reactors need magnetic confinement
>
> Hank Mills
> December 29th, 2013 at
17 matches
Mail list logo
