[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-26 Thread craig
Funny you should mention GE.  When I heard that Passerini had said the customer is "a well-known large industrial group" I immediately thought of GE, (who wouldn't), although I suppose it could be any one of a few other big name players.Anyway, I sent an enquiry to three of GE's senior press people

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-26 Thread Jouni Valkonen
hmm there is something wrong with the tagging... –Jouni 2011/10/27 Jouni Valkonen : > Like usually, Daniele is misinformed with his rumors. The real > Customer is Maddelena! > >    –Jouni > > PS. please clean up the subject line, before sending the message. For > messages with reply only "R

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-26 Thread Jouni Valkonen
Like usually, Daniele is misinformed with his rumors. The real Customer is Maddelena! –Jouni PS. please clean up the subject line, before sending the message. For messages with reply only "Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer", is enough. Having "Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi's cust

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-26 Thread ecat builder
Daniele Passerini has reported that the customer interested in the MW reactor "it is a well-known and largest industrial group" http://freeenergytruth.blogspot.com/2011/10/ecat-customer-is-large-well-known.html Perhaps GE or Siemens? Speculations? - Brad p.s. Rossi said on his blog that the 1MW r

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jay Caplan wrote: ** > Military might want an exclusive interest in a cheap small heat source for > a number of strategic interests including ships . . > They might want exclusive use, but they cannot get it. Too much information about this has already circulated. It is in the hands of people in

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Jay Caplan
o]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer Jay Caplan wrote: Right, between the military interst and NRC regulators, it will be 10-15 years before any of this tech is available for commercial use. Why do you say that military use of technology slows down civilian access to it? In my experience going b

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
> > I expect the EU has similar fair trade laws so I do not think Defkalion will > be able to enforce this policy. I think it makes them look stupid even > mentioning it. Who are they kidding? I suppose they are trying to kid Rossi, > or at least humoring him. I'm not sure that we do. I don't

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Axil Axil
I recognize that if the US government gets control of E-Cat development that will be bad for the cold fusion community because the government will lock down the technology consistent with other nuclear technologies. Jed will naturally fear this turn of events. But consider that Rossi has made

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jay Caplan > wrote: Right, between the military interst and NRC regulators, it will be 10-15 years before any of this tech is available for commercial use. Why do you say that military use of technology slows down civilian access to it? In my experience

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil wrote: There has been a rumor floated that the US Navy is Rossi’s customer in this > week’s upcoming E-Cat trial. This rumor is entirely believable. > I have no idea whether this is true or not, but I note that Rossi is firmly opposed to selling his devices to any military organization

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Jay Caplan
Right, between the military interst and NRC regulators, it will be 10-15 years before any of this tech is available for commercial use. - Original Message - From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 12:26 PM Subject: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer There has been

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Bruno Santos
Wouldn't US Navy have clear grounds to test nuclear devices on US soil? Why would they test the device in Italy? It seems that they didnt't went thru with US-soil-based test because nuclear-device testing in the US is forbidden for private entities. I ask myself if that's the case for the US Nav

[Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Axil Axil
There has been a rumor floated that the US Navy is Rossi’s customer in this week’s upcoming E-Cat trial. This rumor is entirely believable. With the fragmentary background that Rossi has let slip during the last year regarding US government knowledge and participation in the development of the E-C