It is common fr people in total distrust to demand useless test.
I remember of test by militaries on pigs (napalm or nuke...?)
moreover 6 month may give indication of total autonomy, reliability...
it is a big version of the tea kettle.
when you are in denial, you increase the demand to make it
6 Month test, after all.
Frank Acland
November 12th, 2013 at 5:51 PM
Dear Andrea,
1. Is the current long-term validation for the purpose of getting safety
certification for the hot cat?
2. Will the hot cat validation help with safety certification for domestic
e-cat systems?
3. Is the
A 6-month test is ridiculous. It does not prove anything that a 1-month
test would not prove. A week would probably suffice.
- Jed
A 6-month test is getting into Underwriters Laboratory territory. As Rossi
says: different purposes
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
A 6-month test is ridiculous. It does not prove anything that a 1-month
test would not prove. A week would probably
Don't hold your breath :
Andrea Rossi
November 5th, 2013 at 7:25 AM
Marco Serra:
Thank you for your attention, I sympathize with you. I do not know when we will
publish, because it does not depend on me, but surely within 2014. I dare to
foresee before August/September.
But this is not an
ps : Mark Gibbs and I get his seal of approval --
Frank Acland
November 5th, 2013 at 6:30 PM
Dear Andrea,
Is this the Ragone diagram you stand by?
http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/130520_ragone_04-1024×624.png
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Andrea Rossi
November 5th, 2013 at 8:06
and how long has it been since the 1 MW October test? Two years!
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 6, 2013 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)
ps : Mark Gibbs and I get his seal
Dear Alan,
On 6-11-2013 18:11, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Is this the Ragone diagram you stand by?
http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/130520_ragone_04-1024×624.png
I'm afraid the file is not there anymore, as I get an 404 error.
Kind regards,
Rob
I think this is the same image:
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hires/2013/rossitests2.jpg
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Dear Alan,
On 6-11-2013 18:11, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Is this the Ragone diagram you stand by?
- Original Message -
From: Frank Acland ecatwo...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 12:41:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)
I think this is the same image:
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hires/2013
PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)
and how long has it been since the 1 MW October test? Two years!
So what are the in process evaluations currently?
There was talk of something like an Underwriters Laboratories certification
going on.
There was talk of the original 1MW plant undergoing evaluation.
Are there others?
What is the hold-up on manufacturing?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Alan
Alan,
On 6-11-2013 21:48, Alan Fletcher wrote:
It's funny -- I pulled up the Forbes image this morning !
Still there :
http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/130520_ragone_04-1024x624.png
Yep I see, but there is a slight difference between those two:
The one that works has an x
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 12:41:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)
I think this is the same image:
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hires/2013/rossitests2.jpg
Stolen -- With all the attributions cropped off.
14 matches
Mail list logo
