In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:07:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I suppose the press will hear of this, and will be asking questions.
One can only hope! :)
- Jed
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
On 2011-04-15 03:01, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I assume this part is accurately translated:
So there were two parallel lines of research: on one side, the
deuterium and palladium people, who never got anything . . .[...]
Yes, it is. Several people on discussion boards I read on the matter
have
a word is missing: technological I will comment at Daniele's blog.
Otherwise he cannot claim the paternity of Cold Fusion, or of Ni-H LENR.
Peter
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2011-04-15 03:01, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I assume this part is
SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
I assume this part is accurately translated:
So there were two parallel lines of research: on one side, the
deuterium and palladium people, who never got anything . . .[...]
Yes, it is. Several people on discussion boards I read on the matter
have criticized that
On 2011-04-15 16:04, Jed Rothwell wrote:
But Peter Gluck wrote: . . . one word is missing: 'technological.'
What do you mean by missing word? Did Focardi say this and it is
missing from the translation? Or did he fail to say this and he should
have?
He didn't say that in the interview and in
I guess Focardi must have meant there has been no significant technological
progress. After all, he did mention Fleischmann's explosion. (He has it
going the wrong direction.)
- Jed
I am surprised no one else has picked up on this. This part of the Focardi
interview is likely to put the President of Greece and the Min. of Energy in
the hot seat:
it was easy to convince the Greek President, the minister... Consequently
Greece has signed a contract with Rossi and can build
On 2011-04-15 21:07, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I am surprised no one else has picked up on this. This part of the
Focardi interview is likely to put the President of Greece and the Min.
of Energy in the hot seat:
[...]
Does it? Personally when I heard that in the original audio I assumed
what
What I wanted to say with the missing word technological?
The truth is that Pd-D LENR has contributed to science but has not succeeded
to become an energy source.
If it ever will, that's an open question but in the spirit of fairness you
cannot tell that Pd- D is nothing.
The second non-ethical
Mössbauer spectroscopy is a
spectroscopichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopytechnique
based on the recoil-free, resonant absorption and emission of gamma
rays http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray in
solidshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid.
This resonant emission and absorption was first
Hello group,
A human translation in English of the interview to Sergio Focardi linked
here several days ago has been posted on Daniele Passerini's 22passi blog:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/04/sergio-focardi-father-of-ni-h-cold.html
By request of the original interviewers and because the
I assume this part is accurately translated:
So there were two parallel lines of research: on one side, the deuterium
and palladium people, who never got anything . . .
I have heard he feels that way. Maybe he means they have made little
progress toward technology, which is true, but I get the
Isn't it ironic in a way, since you have said before that Arata shares a
similar level of vanity ?
Arata probably considers himself the father of nanoparticle LENR . without
which, Ni-H might not be possible.
. so who's you daddy ?
From: Jed Rothwell
So there were two parallel lines
There is a lot of meat in this report. Read it carefully. A lot of food for
thought. And for gossip!
Focardi clearly says that the Cu isotopes are NOT natural. This contradicts
Essen, as noted here. Mass spectroscopy can be tricky, that's all I know. I
have seen many similar disagreements about
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Isn’t it ironic in a way, since you have said before that Arata shares a
similar level of vanity ?
Yup. I would hate to bring those two together.
Arata probably considers himself the father of nanoparticle LENR … without
which, Ni-H might not be
Jed wrote [snip]
Focardi says some things that are supposed to be confidential. I will leave
it to the reader to find those bits, as an exercise. He's got a big mouth.
I'll bet this ruffles some feathers![/snip]
Focardi says and then there's this chemical compound. The issue came up
during
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:50:39 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
How long would it take if Mills is correct? Does this rapid falling off in
the reaction indicate that the hydrogen is consumed much faster than in a
conventional nuclear reaction?
It well may. If a fast cloning
In reply to francis 's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:26:42 -0400:
Hi,
Not necessarily. It could be producing an x-ray spectrum due to stimulation by
ionizing radiation produced elsewhere.
[snip]
Jed wrote [snip]
Focardi says some things that are supposed to be confidential. I will leave
it
18 matches
Mail list logo
