On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Jarold McWilliams oldja...@hotmail.comwrote:
The problem with all of that is the ones who work the least are the ones
with the most money.
It's only a problem to you.
Do you think Buffet really worked a million times harder than the average
person?
No,
Everything you just said is your personal opinion too you know. People's
values are stupid. You said the guy who was terminally ill would rather have a
good doctor than LENR. This is because he is basing his decision off his
emotions and doesn't think. If LENR was widespread, we could have
move this crap to vortexb-l.
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simple Genius: This Says it all!
From: oldja...@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:48:53 -0600
CC: scott...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
The problem with all of that is the ones who work the least are the ones with
the most money. Do you
This is a political topic which, as Robert pointed out, should be moved to
vortexb-l. However I would like to make some apolitical comments which I
hope will not be considered controversial.
I am a big fan of capitalism. I think I made that clear in my book. It is
not perfect, but no system is.
I agree with you that science and technology is the most important for growth
in society. The only way to improve the economy is to improve science and
technology. Average people and average business owners don't see the benefits
of improvements in technology. Average people can only think
Von: Jarold McWilliams oldja...@hotmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 22:07 Freitag, 17.Februar 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Simple Genius: This Says it all!
I agree with you that science and technology is the most important for growth
in society
Technological development is very welcome, in part for the increase in
productivity that it brings and for its connection to economic growth. But
the introduction of significant gains in productivity is a two-edged sword.
It can often lead to people's skills becoming irrelevant and their
It's a good thing that people's jobs become irrelevant. You know what you do
when technology replaces jobs? You don't create more worthless office jobs,
but you shorten the workweek while still getting paid the same. Technology
should replace jobs. There is no need to work 40 hours anymore.
Of course, this misses the point:
In a country with rapidly widening structural socio-economic classes (as is
dramatically happening now in the US -- see Charles Murray's latest study to
get a sense of the magnitude of the divide) no matter how the lower or
under-classes work, they will not
This message is mostly n hoax, anyway. The funny thing it is that George
Orwell(pen name of *Eric Arthur Blair*) was a socialist, he fought in the
Spanish civil war along the side of the anarcho syndicalists
and, intellectually, he had influences from Trotsky. If one reads 1984,
there is a
The problem with all of that is the ones who work the least are the ones with
the most money. Do you think Buffet really worked a million times harder than
the average person? Socialism does not mean equality, but I really don't think
Buffet deserves to make a million times more just because
11 matches
Mail list logo
