Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-15 Thread Alain Sepeda
the difference is that it needed no instrument to be observed (levitation), and that physicist have replicated it, and not only chemist... The tragedy of LENr is that is chemistry experiment, indirectly measured through invisible characteristic needing confidence in instruments and computation

Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-15 Thread Peter Gluck
The man difference: HTSC was discovered too early in the good place.; CF was discovered also too early but in the worst place wet electrochemical system- where it is inherently unmanageable irreproducible and can not grow up. A scientific tragedy. Peter On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Alain

RE: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-15 Thread Jones Beene
There is a pre-theory of formative hypothesis which explains some of the mechanism of HTSC from physical observations. Joe Eck, who is the Jed Rothwell of HTSC - has this theory listed on his site as “PWD theory”. http://www.superconductors.org/pwtheory.htm Notably - the

Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-15 Thread Eric Walker
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Joe Eck, who is the Jed Rothwell of HTSC - has this theory listed on his site as “PWD theory”. http://www.superconductors.org/pwtheory.htm I suspect he's not the Jed Rothwell of HTSC, but instead perhaps the John Rohner

Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-15 Thread Kevin O'Malley
Yes, a major difference was that LENR was discovered when there was an established, entrenched group which stood to lose out of their public feeding trough if it were true. That was not the case with HTSC. No one lost their funding or ruined their career when they investigated HTSC. On Sun,

Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-15 Thread Danny Ross Lunsford
.   --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin From: Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 12:33 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K

[Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-14 Thread Axil Axil
http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-14 Thread Kevin O'Malley
And yet, there is still no established HTSC theory. Using the reasoning that has been applied to LENR... therefore, HTSC must not exist. On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm I am please to be the first to post that

Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)

2014-06-14 Thread Eric Walker
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K) Who are Superconductors.ORG? It seems that they have made