http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/90
It is now universally accepted that the reservoir of energy stored in the
sun’s atmospheric magnetic field is what heats the localized plasma in the
corona. In simplified terms, the field is generated in the solar interior
as a result of large-scale
Sure, and it was universally accepted in 1600 that the Sun revolved around
the earth.
Fundamental change in mainstream perceptions, even with the advantage of the
internet - takes a little while to set in.
In fact Robin's 'outrageous' suggestion is almost as likely as induction of
a
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/90
It is now universally accepted that the reservoir of energy stored in the
sun’s atmospheric magnetic field is what heats the localized plasma in the
corona. In simplified terms, the
: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 15, 2012 12:56 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The faint young Sun paradox
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/90
It is now universally accepted
Models of the Sun's evolution predict the Sun was 70% percent as
bright 2 billion years ago, and the Earth should have been an ice ball
at that time. Yet the geological record indicates the oceans were
liquid.
A number of explanations have been proposed which haven't faired well
upon closer
Probably the most sensible solution is that the atmosphere was
significantly thicker. 30% less heat input would drop the earth's
temperature by about 20°C, but 20% more mass of air would increase the
temperature by about 20°C at ground level. We know that during the age of
the dinosaurs that
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46632008/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/mystery-still-why-early-earth-didnt-freeze-over/
For greenhouse gases to explain the faint young sun paradox, their
concentrations would need to have been extremely high, hundreds to
thousands of times as much as today.
If
A more sensible solution is that was NO faint young sun to begin with.
The same flawed model of solar mechanics that gives us the solar neutrino
problem also gives us the faint young sun problem. They invented a straw man
that never was much more than fiction, and now that they are trying to
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
A more sensible solution is that was NO faint young sun to begin with.
I was waiting for someone to suggest this possibility.
The same flawed model of solar mechanics that gives us the solar neutrino
problem also
Harry,
I have not followed Mills' cosmological arguments for years and they may
have changed. IIRC he thinks 100% of the UV and EUV (which is the main
emission spectrum for f/H) and something like 40% of the net thermal energy
received on earth comes from the Corona. That instantly solves the
Just a bunch of collapsed microsingularities emitting hawking radiation
around the sun collapsed due to the intense gravity and flux. The smaller
they are the hotter they get. The smallest might get up to... 5.6×1032 K vs
a monster black hole in the emptiest part of space which is somewhat
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:47:44 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The solar model of Mills posits non-nuclear hydrogen energy from the solar
corona, and thereby solves both problems, and more. This corona energy may
see-saw in intensity with fusion energy in the core.
Here's
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:42 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:47:44 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The solar model of Mills posits non-nuclear hydrogen energy from the solar
corona, and thereby solves both problems, and more. This corona energy may
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:36:58 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:42 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:47:44 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The solar model of Mills posits non-nuclear hydrogen energy from the
14 matches
Mail list logo
