Jones Beene wrote:
> … “spewing” may not be accurate, if you mean that a solid or a liquid is
> carelessly released. Their reactors were sealed and pressurized, so that if
> anything was released, a slow leak of a radioactive gas (radon, tritium or
> xenon) is the best candidate. . . .
>
I do n
From: Jed Rothwell
As noted here, those people died of cancer at a fairly young age. I cannot
judge, but I got the impression their techniques and measurements were
crude. That is also what others said. McKubre told me they scared the hell
out of him. He thought they were "reducing" radioac
Jones Beene wrote:
> The connection is that both use electrochemistry (and LENR techniques) to
> create nuclear reactions which secondarily transmute heavy metals. Here is
> an old IE article on the CGC
>
> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/IE13-14CincinattiGroup.pdf
As noted here, th
From: Peter Gluck
Dear Jones
How is connected GENIE with the Cincy Cell- in your opinion?
The connection is that both use electrochemistry (and LENR techniques) to
create nuclear reactions which secondarily transmute heavy metals. Here is
an old IE
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, blaze spinnaker <
> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The GeNiE Reactor is lower cost since it doesn't required enriched uranium
>> and it doesn't produce hazardous nuclear waste that is costly to handle.
>
Dear Jones
How is connected GENIE with the Cincy Cell- in your opinion?
Americium per se is very dangerous, see please:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americium#Health_issues
Peter
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Peter Gluck
>
> ** **
>
> Both inventors- w
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, blaze spinnaker
wrote:
The GeNiE Reactor is lower cost since it doesn't required enriched uranium
> and it doesn't produce hazardous nuclear waste that is costly to handle.
>
One problem with neutrons is that we want fewer of them in the world, not
more of them.
>
>
> However, if fast neutrons are being produced - they would NOT need uranium
> and all the baggage that goes with this element, both in terms of PR and
> cost. Therefore, one has to doubt the veracity of some of the information
> coming out.
>
> ** **
>
>
>
Interesting patent:
http://pate
Maybe by the time Navy's patent was filed in, the others were still not
analyzed.
2013/7/12 Jones Beene
> Curious, that the Navy cites Mitchell Swartz’s applications (and Arata)
> as prior art – all of which have NOT been granted,**
>
> **
>
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
The advantage of using Uranium is that it's production is controlled by
friendly powers (US/Canada/Australia/etc). Perhaps this was a way to get
various scientifically naive but highly influential individuals on board.
The GEC board of directors, Khim says, includes some well-known Washington
D.
Just an observation, but it looks as though the G.E.C site hasn't been
updated since 2010. There's been a lot happening in the LENR field in
those three short years. Where have they been?
Bob
On 7/12/2013 12:26 PM, blaze spinnaker wrote:
The Genie sounds like LENR after it's been accepted:
From: Peter Gluck
Both inventors- who have later worked with Americium, have died
due to leukemia. It was a tragedy- however no transmutation takes place,
sorry for that.
Yes too bad, and your report casts doubt on the GEC implementation (unless
the two died of neutron radiation unbeknown
What's interesting to me is that if this works, LENR isn't as important.
The GeNiE Reactor is not prone to melt down since it doesn't rely on a
chain-reaction to produce high-energy neutrons. The GeNiE Reactor will
extract more energy from the fuel than conventional nuclear Reactors. The
GeNiE Rea
The Genie sounds like LENR after it's been accepted:
1. Our experiments are repeatable.
2. Our experiments have been replicated by others.
3. Our experiments provide direct evidence that nuclear reactions are
involved including the production of high-energy neutrons. Although our
ex
Re the US 20030201167 A1 patent of the Cincinnati Group:
I have met Gleeson and Holloman at Asti -7, we became friends
and Don has donated a Cincy Cell to me for testing, does it transmute elements
or not. The cell was filled with a dilute solution
of a thorium salt and HCl and after the forced hi
Curious detail in all of this Navy-gravy is worth a quick mention . since we
are all concerned about getting LENR to market quickly.
Who would have expected that Guam, of all places, would be benefiting from
this breakthrough power source? Well . Navy Base Quam and an associated
airfield ar
Curious, that the Navy cites Mitchell Swartz's applications (and Arata) as
prior art - all of which have NOT been granted, and the Navy does NOT
mention the one which they flagrantly copy. We need a massive overhaul of
USPTO due to extreme incompetence.
US Navy or not . this patent seems to be
https://www.google.com/patents/US8419919?dq=11/859,499&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A5rfUe70HMen4AO3yIFw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA
This U.S. Navy patent transmutes radioactive elements into less harmful
elements through a benign low energy nuclear reaction process. The patent
was granted April 16, 2013 for a device and
18 matches
Mail list logo