Re: [Vo]:Whether Cold Fusion or Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, U.S. Navy Researchers Reopen Case

2021-03-23 Thread Nicholas Palmer
Maybe just too much evidence has accumulated to ignore any more Nick Palmer On the side of the Planet - and the people - because they're worth it On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 22:58, CB Sites wrote: > Thanks Jed. It's interesting to see the IEEE Spectrum leaving a crack > open for further

Re: [Vo]:Whether Cold Fusion or Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, U.S. Navy Researchers Reopen Case

2021-03-23 Thread CB Sites
Thanks Jed. It's interesting to see the IEEE Spectrum leaving a crack open for further possibilities coming from CF research. I noticed another article in the side panel from the same author that I thought I would pass along;

Re: [Vo]:Whether Cold Fusion or Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, U.S. Navy Researchers Reopen Case

2021-03-23 Thread Terry Blanton
*The researchers say they hope to publish their initial results by the end of the year. “I think the most important thing is to reveal a mechanism by which the phenomenon works,” says Gotzmer. “Because if you understand the mechanism, then you can extrapolate into better experiments and make it

[Vo]:Whether Cold Fusion or Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, U.S. Navy Researchers Reopen Case

2021-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
News report: https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/energy/nuclear/cold-fusion-or-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-us-navy-researchers-reopen-case Whether Cold Fusion or Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, U.S. Navy Researchers Reopen Case Spurred on by continued anomalous nuclear results, multiple labs now