I think the car examples are because they are easy to communicate.
No serious investor will make that in itself a major factor in an
investment decision, We are talking millions and that is a lot of money
even for the super rich.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 18
I believe that the LENR reaction can be adjusted to provide an output that
is more well suited for the auto market. Both Mills and Papp generate a
large amount of XUV and x-ray EMF, but papp added xenon (Xe) and other
noble gases to his fuel mixture. These additions convert XUV and x-rays
into clu
Here is a nifty data browser for electricity net generation:
http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/?src=home-f1
It shows the rise of gas and wind energy, and the fall of coal. It shows
wind overtaking hydro.
This is actual net generation, not capacity.
Move the cursor to the graph lines t
Bob Cook wrote:
> The idea of making the device good for a car to justify its rapid
> introduction commercially was just a pipe dream for gullible investors in
> my mind.
>
Yes. Cold fusion researchers, "over unity" energy researchers and others
are mesmerized by the automobile market. They have
4 matches
Mail list logo
