Hi All
I see no evidence for a box trade; just as there
was none on 9-11-01. The gangsters took a real
hit, and we should thank the courageous whistle
blowers at Minot and Barksdale. But we should
not forget that the Oil Gang is still running the
show. To avoid tragic exposure to the Kazakh
Well said.
Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Hi All
I see no evidence for a box trade; just as there
was none on 9-11-01. The gangsters took a real
hit, and we should thank the courageous whistle
blowers at Minot and Barksdale. But we should
not forget that the Oil Gang is still running the
show. To
Hi All,
Only 15 min. to 4 pm EST on 9-21-07.
It's exciting.
Jack Smith
OrionWorks wrote:
UFO scholars
enthusiasts - some whom are utterly convinced the craft is the result
of reversed engineered alien technology. The alleged alien connection
is probably a rumor the DOD helps
Sorry about that; I forgot that I'm on EDT.
Anyway, about 52 minutes to go.
Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Hi All,
Only 15 min. to 4 pm EST on 9-21-07.
It's exciting.
Jack Smith
--- Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Sorry about that; I forgot that I'm on EDT.
Anyway, about 52 minutes to go.
Only 15 min. to 4 pm EST on 9-21-07.
Not to mention there is yet another reason that today
would have been the perfect day for any big
statement from Bin Laden, if he were not impotent
Howdy Vorts,
Something to think about is the dollar is trading against the Euro at $ 1.40
The last time we had such a drop was 1973 after Nixon took the US off keying
the dollar to gold at 35 bucks apop. The Mex peso free floated at that time
This time it's the dollar that will free float
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Why would they want to start a thermonuclear war when they are
beating the pants off us economically? In another 20 years, the
way change is
The match in
On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
By what time on 9-21-07 must the Short Seller deliver the stock?
Horace Heffner wrote:
It depends on the exchange on which it was written and traded. You
may be referring to FTSE (London) options, which would (I think)
expire late
On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
By what time on 9-21-07 must the Short Seller deliver the stock?
Horace Heffner wrote:
It depends on the exchange on which it was written and traded. You
may be referring to FTSE
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Why would they want to start a thermonuclear war when they are
beating the pants off us economically? In another 20 years, the way
change is
The match in the tinder box is the Israeli State. Russia is allied
thomas malloy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Why would they want to start a thermonuclear war when they are
beating the pants off us economically? In another 20 years, the way
change is
The match in the tinder box is the Israeli
Hi All, 9-17-07
In an effort to get more background on the Bin Laden Trades,
I've ordered the 2 books mentioned below.
I guess we are still in danger of a false flag attack.
By what time on 9-21-07 must the Short Seller deliver the stock?
Jack Smith
---
Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Hi All, 9-17-07
In an effort to get more background on the Bin Laden Trades,
I've ordered the 2 books mentioned below.
I guess we are still in danger of a false flag attack.
By what time on 9-21-07 must the Short Seller deliver the stock?
Jack Smith
I'm
On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
By what time on 9-21-07 must the Short Seller deliver the stock?
It depends on the exchange on which it was written and traded. You
may be referring to FTSE (London) options, which would (I think)
expire late Friday morning EST. For
thomas malloy wrote:
Standing Bear wrote:
On Saturday 15 September 2007 02:12, you wrote:
Standing Bear wrote:
On Friday 14 September 2007 14:02, Jed Rothwell wrote:
thomas malloy wrote
As for stealing one, forget it in the
United States unless one's group is prepared to
Terry Blanton wrote:
Happy New Year (5768), Hezbollah!
Terry
Happy new year to you Terry, I went outside after the Sun set and
waited until I could count three stars,. 8:05 CDST.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296686,00.html
http://tinyurl.com/ytmtsh
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Vortexians;
Rumor has it that someone would have gotten into the military's
communication system in order to have stolen the nuke. This whole
scenario seems like waving a flag in front of a bull.
The discussion about the missing nuke makes me wonder about stealing one
verses buying or
thomas malloy wrote:
The discussion about the missing nuke makes me wonder about stealing
one verses buying or building one.
All of the expert opinion I have seen is that it would be easiest by
far to purchase a loose nuke from one of the ex-Soviet Union
states. This is the most likely
On Friday 14 September 2007 14:02, Jed Rothwell wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
The discussion about the missing nuke makes me wonder about stealing
one verses buying or building one.
All of the expert opinion I have seen is that it would be easiest by
far to purchase a loose nuke from one
For those of you who have been following this story and who are not
overloaded with things to worry about, here is some interesting information.
Ed
Is USAF Stand Down To
Find A Missing Nuke?
Someone, operating under a special chain of command within
the United States Air Force, just stole a
For the benefit of Michel and others who get an occasional chuckle over
the you heard it first on vortex shtick - which is the lure
sometimes used to entice readers to a particularly far-out message ...
well, in this case, perhaps you really did hear it first on Vo.
All of the connections in
Yes Jones, to your credit you first pieced together this information and
alerted us on Vortex. However, the essay I sent put together a great
deal more background information that gives the impression, at least to
me, that the writer knows what he is talking about and has information
Sorry that my post gave the wrong (unintended) impression. Far from
reject the claims, I was merely trying to be realistic in how far this
story can go.
I absolutely agree with you Ed, that this incident demands a thorough
and open investigation at the highest levels; and that any credibility
Here's something to think about:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/12/
wisrael112.xml
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Horace Heffner wrote:
Here's something to think about:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/12/wisrael112.xml
Begging the question ... what was the target out there in the Syrian desert?
Hmmm. Of all the the strange theories - there is the North Korea link...
This
Happy New Year (5768), Hezbollah!
Terry
On 9/13/07, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's something to think about:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/12/
wisrael112.xml
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On 9/13/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some Prince in Arabia financed the whole deal and hoped to recoup his
investment with the short-option, aka: Bin Laden trades.
Or some company in Dubai . . .
Anyway, some people are noticing:
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 9/13/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some Prince in Arabia financed the whole deal and hoped to recoup his
investment with the short-option, aka: Bin Laden trades.
Or some company in Dubai . . .
Anyway, some people are noticing:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 9/13/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some Prince in Arabia financed the whole deal and hoped to recoup his
investment with the short-option, aka: Bin Laden trades.
Or some company in Dubai . . .
Anyway, some people are
30 matches
Mail list logo
