Thanks Horace, I'll certainly look into thatHorace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wrote: "Jefimenko also produces the complete quantitative results you arelooking for."That should have read, "Jefimenko also produces complete quantitativeresults, but as with the relativistic results of Purcell
I wrote: "Jefimenko also produces the complete quantitative results you are
looking for."
That should have read, "Jefimenko also produces complete quantitative
results, but as with the relativistic results of Purcell, Shadowitz, and
others, they deny the effect you hope to see, namely an increase
At 11:32 AM 1/31/5, Merlyn wrote:
>OK, I've done some more pondering on the whole thing, and I think I may
>have an answer.
>
>Assuming the electric field propagates at c, as the magnetic field is
>proven to do, then there would be a notable "dopplering" of the field
>gradient surrounding a moving
OK, I've done some more pondering on the whole thing, and I think I may have an answer.
Assuming the electric field propagates at c, as the magnetic field is proven to do, then there would be a notable "dopplering" of the field gradient surrounding a moving charged particle.
This Doppler effect
OK, I've been trying to get my head around the mechanism behind magnetism. I see a magnetic field as a disturbance in the aether caused by a moving charge. Where I bog down is trying to understand how this disturbance overcomes the natural repulsion between like charges.
The mental experiment I
5 matches
Mail list logo
