Given a 30 percent drop in the Atlantic conveyor belt flow rate in 12
years:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1898493,00.html
it may be that there is a powerful but not yet understood biological
feedback occurring in the ocean due to a reduced nutrient flow from
the depths caused
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:21:17
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
Given a 30 percent drop in the Atlantic conveyor belt flow rate in 12
years:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1898493,00.html
it may be that there is a powerful but not yet understood biological
On Mar 18, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
I tried to show that even an exponential curve doesn't appear to
be rising fast enough, so yes I think we are up the proverbial
creek without a paddle.
Well, lets just hope the numbers are either highly local, or just
plain wrong.
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Sat, 18 Mar
2006 22:52:34 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: Robin van Spaandonk
I tried to show that even an exponential curve doesn't appear to
be rising fast enough, so yes I think we are up the proverbial
creek without a paddle.
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:06:25
-0500:
Hi,
[snip]
What is the uncertainty in these figures?
Harry
[snip]
I have no idea. However at least one of them applies to only one
specific measurement station.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:03:49
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
Polar carbon dioxide increasing at surprising rate. See:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1729255,00.html
In 1990 this key cause of global warming was rising at a rate of 1
part per million (ppm).
On Mar 17, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:03:49
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
Polar carbon dioxide increasing at surprising rate. See:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1729255,00.html
In 1990 this key cause of global
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:15:08
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
If it is indeed true then I could not agree more that it is
catastrophic. I think independent confirmation is badly needed, not
just at Mount Zeppelin but all over the polar regions. Too bad NASA
has been
On Mar 17, 2006, at 9:33 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
(BTW krill are crustaceans, so they should be creating CO2, not
consuming it).
Check out:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/02/060206230630.htm
I mentioned krill because I think I read about an unexplained krill
population
Polar carbon dioxide increasing at surprising rate. See:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1729255,00.html
In 1990 this key cause of global warming was rising at a rate of 1
part per million (ppm). Recently, that rate reached 2 ppm per year.
Now, scientists at the Mount Zeppelin
10 matches
Mail list logo