Mixent makes a good point here. I read somewhere that UDH of was it
rydberg matter is a frozen plasma. If the definition of a plasma is total
charge separation, then UDH is a plasma. There is a positive core and a
negative electron spin wave covering that core on the outside of this
nanowire so UD
In reply to 's message of Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:55:21
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Holmilds laser source description does not indicated a chirped laser source
>IMHO.
>
>AxilWhat do yo mean by carrier material?
>
>As Axil has pointed out, the experimental process would not seem to produce
>much plasma
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fast particles
Re: "Axil—What do yo mean by “carrier material”?"
The experiments of Holmlid explains how these nanoparticles work. IMHO in the
Holmlid experiment, ultra-dense hydrogen (UDH) is produced in the presence of
hydrogen by the iron oxide
pedia.org/wiki/Critical_mass>, and
> may potentially be useful for spacecraft ‘propulsion
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter_catalyzed_nuclear_pulse_propulsion>
> .’
>
>
>
> It may be that the laser pulse changes the charge on one or two protons or
> deuterons si
>> nuclear byproducts!
>>
>> LENR folks are not used to these power densities.
>>
>> ----------
>> *From:* Axil Axil
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 23, 2017 11:00 AM
>> *To:* vortex-l
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Fast particles
>>
>> From:
&
mited family of nuclear
> byproducts!
>
> LENR folks are not used to these power densities.
>
> --
> *From:* Axil Axil
> *Sent:* Monday, January 23, 2017 11:00 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Fast particles
>
> From:
>
> Laser
day, January 23, 2017 10:57 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fast particles
Ok - it is likely from the specs that Holmlid's laser is not a (chirp amplified
pulse) CAP using exotic gratings and so forth. That is important.
Since it is simply a plain vanilla low-powered-pulse f
sufficient to cause an unlimited family of nuclear
> byproducts!
>
>
> LENR folks are not used to these power densities.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Axil Axil
> *Sent:* Monday, January 23, 2017 11:00 AM
>
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Fas
Ok - it is likely from the specs that Holmlid's laser is not a (chirp
amplified pulse) CAP using exotic gratings and so forth. That is important.
Since it is simply a plain vanilla low-powered-pulse from a ow priced
laser ... but it a pulse which works... and if we believe it works, then
tha
10 to the 12th watts is sufficient to cause an unlimited family of nuclear
byproducts!
LENR folks are not used to these power densities.
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 11:00 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fast particles
From:
Laser
e failure to describe the laser input casts a pall on everything he has
> posted in the last 20 years.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Axil Axil
> *Sent:* Monday, January 23, 2017 12:12 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Fast particles
>
> I don.t
chirped laser
capabilities since 1998.
The failure to describe the laser input casts a pall on everything he has
posted in the last 20 years.
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:12 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fast particles
I don.t think
I don.t think that Holmlid is producing a hydrogen plasma at the place
where the LASER strikes the collection foil, because the Ultra Dense
hydrogen on the collection foil is not ionized as it falls by gravity from
the iron oxide catalyst into the collection foil, A plasma would be too
energetic to
13 matches
Mail list logo
