Axil,
Good idea, The geometry of the powder to tungsten interface
might be a concern because of the high melting point of tungsten but as far
as material selection the anomalous behavior of tungsten and atomic hydrogen
goes all the way back to Langmuir. My question is regarding the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:19:48 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Rossi could use tungsten as a replacement for stainless steel (SS) as the
>shell of his reaction vessel. The nano-powder has a higher melting
>temperature then SS. Tungsten is also opaque to x-rays/gamma-rays can
>repl
Axil Axil wrote:
For a cold fusion reactor like any other reactor type, the guiding
design goal is to produce a large, cost effective, passively
self-limiting, reactor design that is intrinsically safe rather than a
design that has 1000’s of inefficient hard to control and resource
intensive
I hear the "all we can do is wait until October" a lot. If just a few people
were working on replication, we could get details a lot sooner than
October/November...
Rossi is very kind to answer questions on his blog. I've asked a number of
questions trying to learn about what is going on and witho
For a cold fusion reactor like any other reactor type, the guiding design
goal is to produce a large, cost effective, passively self-limiting, reactor
design that is intrinsically safe rather than a design that has 1000’s of
inefficient hard to control and resource intensive units. Electric utiliti
At 10:19 PM 6/19/2011, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi could use tungsten as a
replacement for stainless steel (SS) as the shell of his reaction vessel.
The nano-powder has a higher melting temperature then SS. Tungsten is
also opaque to x-rays/gamma-rays can replace lead shielding; and very
importantly,
Axil,
Good idea, The geometry of the powder to tungsten interface
might be a concern because of the high melting point of tungsten but as far
as material selection the anomalous behavior of tungsten and atomic hydrogen
goes all the way back to Langmuir. My question is regarding the
Rossi could use tungsten as a replacement for stainless steel (SS) as the
shell of his reaction vessel. The nano-powder has a higher melting
temperature then SS. Tungsten is also opaque to x-rays/gamma-rays can
replace lead shielding; and very importantly, it is also impermeable to
hydrogen
As a c
At 02:46 PM 6/19/2011, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-06-19 02:40 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 08:08 AM 6/19/2011, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-06-19 05:34 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
In reply to francis 's message of Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:11:41 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Why not control the pump speed electronically (as well)?
>Stephen,
>
> I think you might be missing the point, in free running the
>OOP is AT the critical temperature and the heat sinking must be exactly
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:16:03 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>At 10:57 PM 6/18/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
>>In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:32:54 -0400:
>>Hi,
>>[snip]
>> >It's being operated, apparently, at a balance point. Other
On 11-06-19 02:40 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 08:08 AM 6/19/2011, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-06-19 05:34 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
When E-Cats work without a drive, Rossi has to
At 08:08 AM 6/19/2011, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-06-19 05:34 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
When E-Cats work without a drive, Rossi has to operate alone on
them for safety reasons.
This is
At 10:57 PM 6/18/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:32:54 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>It's being operated, apparently, at a balance point. Other designs
...or as Dr. Schwartz would say, an OOP.
Well, no, even though I did refer to that term
Please add at this top as an edit...
Rossi runs his reactor subcritically. That is, the maximum amount of heat
that his reactor can produce will NOT increase internal reactor heat
production beyond a self-reinforcing increasing takeoff point.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi adds externally generated heat to reach and maintain steady state heat
production equilibrium.
One passive way to decrease reactor heat production is to decrease hydrogen
pressure. This can be done by absorbing hydrogen from the hydrogen envelope
using a hydride producing metal; for example,
Stephen,
I think you might be missing the point, in free running the
OOP is AT the critical temperature and the heat sinking must be exactly
balanced between quenching and runaway while "normal" operation is kept
slightly below the critical temperature such that a PWM can push the
m
it 70/30 Ni/Cu alloy powders?
I think we need more discussion on the Fe from rust role.
- Original Message -
From: francis
To: uniqueprodu...@comcast.net
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New private E-Cat test with no input energy
On 2011-06-19 14:08, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
How many reactions, which produce heat, and which may produce runaway
heat, can be quenched by ... *heating them up* ?
To be fair, I don't think this is what Rossi actually means.
Self-sustaining reactors probably operate on a closed loop, heate
> How many reactions, which produce heat, and which may produce
> runaway heat, can be quenched by ... *heating them up* ?
>
> I would call that another big red flag.
>
I hope this thing is not a fake; I am just barely over the
trauma of the Steorn debacle.
On 11-06-19 05:34 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
When E-Cats work without a drive, Rossi has to operate alone on them
for safety reasons.
This is such a facile explanation ... We m
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
When E-Cats work without a drive, Rossi has to operate alone on them for
safety reasons. However Dr.Bianchini from the University of Bologna had
special permission to witness one on
Jay,
Excellent idea - could even use off the shelf heat exchanger as your
link seems to indicate they already have their brazed products in automotive
and aerospace equipment. I like the idea of the heat transfer fluid being
inside the exchanger with the sputtered powder on the outside and
cast.net
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com ; Teofilo, Vince ; zpe.asymmat...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New private E-Cat test with no input energy
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:42:10 Jay Caplan wrote [snip]I agree. Since several
devices have melted down befor
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:32:54 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>It's being operated, apparently, at a balance point. Other designs
...or as Dr. Schwartz would say, an OOP.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:42:10 Jay Caplan wrote [snip]I agree. Since several
devices have melted down before, it is obvious that it doesn't need elec
input to work, just reacting nearby the high temps of the resistance
element. Once heated uniformly to reaction temps and self sustaining, the
key woul
With this level
of temp control, the micro reactor array may be superseded by one large one.
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:New private E-Cat test with no input energy
What took so
IMHO, the mechanism behind the activity within the nano-sized nuclear sites
in the Ni-H reactor type is derived from some unusual form of hydrogen such
as Heavy Rydberg (H + / H –) system, Rydberg ions, atoms and/or matter in
one form or another or in combination. Production of Rydberg matter throu
I wrote:
> I think [heat after death] is caused by having a large bulk of Pd that
> stores a lot of deuterium which gradually comes of the bulk to the surface.
>
I say that because the largest example of heat after death was Mizuno's
event in 1991. The cathode was 100 g. That is 100 to 1000 time
At 12:32 PM 6/18/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-06-18 18:27, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Some more info:
* * *
3) What do you consider is the maximum âsafeâ output level?
4) Do you think the one megawatt power plant
being opened by Defkalion might operate with zero input?
http://www.
At 12:27 PM 6/18/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
Some more info:
* * *
Could you please share a few extra details about the experiment?
- The size of the E-Cat (50cc or one liter in volume).
- How
At 12:08 PM 6/18/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Nothing took so long. They have been doing tests without input for a
couple of years. Levi described one in December. However, Rossi
claims this mode of running is dangerous because it cannot be controlled.
I've seen some rather silly skeptical comme
Peter Gluck wrote:
> As regarding heat after death in classical CF it was rather rare- I cannot
> remember more than 5 documented cases.
>
Not true. Fleischmann andPons in France produced heat after death hundreds
of times. They ran banks of 64 cells and pushed them all to a boil-off
followed
y, June 18, 2011 10:28 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:New private E-Cat test with no input energy
>
> ** **
>
> Stimulating is good, negative stimulents as Steve's reaction
>
> are better, it seems. (No more tests, who said it?)
>
>
On 2011-06-18 18:27, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Some more info:
* * *
3) What do you consider is the maximum “safe” output level?
4) Do you think the one megawatt power plant being opened by Defkalion
might operate with zero input?
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=13#comm
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
Some more info:
* * *
Could you please share a few extra details about the experiment?
- The size of the E-Cat (50cc or one liter in volume).
- How high the output went before the test had to en
the attempt for 1 MW.
Warmest Regards,
Mike
From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:28 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New private E-Cat test with no input energy
Stimulating is good, negative stimulents as Steve's reaction
are b
Please do not forget, Piantelli had a cell working with no input, at 70W
already in 2000. Then his lab was relocated more times and his progress has
slowed down. But now he is working again
.
Therefore a working zero input E-cat is quite "naturaL' even if as Rossi
claims, the two Ni-H LENR process
Jones Beene wrote:
What took so long?
>
Nothing took so long. They have been doing tests without input for a couple
of years. Levi described one in December. However, Rossi claims this mode of
running is dangerous because it cannot be controlled. This has often been
discussed here. It is liste
What took so long?
This is "good-news/bad-news" in a way. But it totally expected. In short, it
can be shown logically that multiple units of any thermally triggered,
overunity device MUST be amenable to operation with no input energy, once
started.
IOW - this result is completely expected
Stimulating is good, negative stimulents as Steve's reaction
are better, it seems. (No more tests, who said it?)
We had the opportunity to observe that the E-cat has quite sharp verbal
claws, not always retracted.
Let's hope there will be energetically independent greater E-cats.
On Sat, Jun 18
41 matches
Mail list logo
