Re: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen

2015-10-23 Thread Mats Lewan
Jones, I tried to express a similar concept in a more 'popular' way in this blog post: http://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/02/10/time-to-dispel-the-streetlight-paradox-of-energy/ Bottom line -- sooner or later, efficient access to energy stored in matter will make scarcity of energy be a

Re: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen

2015-10-23 Thread Axil Axil
More... See http://pieeconomics.blogspot.com/p/cavitation-radiation.html The reason why radiation is seen in cavitation is that there is not enough heat available in a water envirnment to setup a entangled ensemble of SPP black holes to counter the radiation produced in the spp formation

Re: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen

2015-10-23 Thread Axil Axil
It is more complicated that just hydrogen rydberg matter. The same rydberg matter principle applies to any alkali metal. There is even more element that this principle applies to. And water can form this stuff too. Remember that Holmlid uses the tried and true potassium catalyst that thermicore

Re: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen

2015-10-23 Thread Axil Axil
Why does the LeClair reactor produce radiation and neutrons and the device invented by James Griggs does not? It’s a matter of temperature. The James Griggs device runs at an operating temperature of 400F, whereas, the LeClair reactor is not pressurized and does not. Since the Hydrogen Rydberg

Re: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen

2015-10-23 Thread David Roberson
vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 4:27 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: That door could open to more than energy independence. In this connection, if the i

RE: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen

2015-10-23 Thread Jones Beene
Mats, Nice effort. Your piece will be poignant lesson to mainstream physics – should Holmlid be shown to be correct - that physics is still in its infancy. Notice that the focus could now be shifting to Holmlid and a few others, and away from Rossi. Rossi filled a void in a way that

Re: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen

2015-10-23 Thread Eric Walker
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Jones Beene wrote: That door could open to more than energy independence. In this connection, if the induced-decay stuff that Robin and I were discussing turns out to be a thing, there are definitely military applications. First one that

Re: [Vo]:One imaginary Future for dense hydrogen

2015-10-23 Thread Axil Axil
Why does the LeClair reactor produce radiation and neutrons and the device invented by James Griggs does not? It’s a matter of temperature. The James Griggs device runs at an operating temperature of 400F, whereas, the LeClair reactor is not pressurized and does not. Since the Hydrogen Rydberg