Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-10-05 Thread Alan J Fletcher
At 12:08 PM 10/1/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote: From: BUSHNELL Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:55:10 -0500 To: Steven Krivit Subject: Request Put in your Blog. My well done remark referred to the accuracy of your reporting of my quotes from the GRC meeting. Period. Was not referring to the veracity

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-10-01 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-09-30 11:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote: It could mean different things depending on the reader's point of view, in my opinion. Daniele Passerini got permission to post the following reply from Bushnell to Krivit in his blog. He added it in a comment in this link, but I think he

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-30 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello Group, Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here: This has been posted in the comments section. I'm assuming the email is authentic: Received via e-mail: “Well done, as usual. Look forward to your reporting of the upcoming Rossi

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-30 Thread Daniel Rocha
So, Dennis Bushnell is Krivit's acolyte? 2011/9/30 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello Group, Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here: This has been posted in the comments section. I'm assuming the email is authentic:

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-30 Thread Alan J Fletcher
At 05:26 AM 9/30/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote: So, Dennis Bushnell is Krivit's acolyte? Received via e-mail: “Well done, as usual. Look forward to your reporting of the upcoming Rossi tests.” Dennis Bushnell luke (luca) says: September 30, 2011 at 14:12 Dr. Bushnell you are going on the

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-30 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-09-30 18:15, Alan J Fletcher wrote: luke (luca) says: September 30, 2011 at 14:12 [...] Given the wording of this comment, if Krivit forgets to post Bushnell's answer, that could be erroneously interpreted as his confirmation that the tests were not positive. User luke (luka)

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello Group, Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here: This is Rossi's rebuttal: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=9#comment-83748 WARNING: THE SNAKE HAS WRITTEN IN HIS BLOG THAT NASA MADE A NOT POSITIVE TEST WITH US.

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread Michele Comitini
All bets are off. The catalyst that ignites Rossi's powerful hot reactions is now well known and proven: KrIvIt. mic 2011/9/29 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello Group, Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here: This is

RE: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From: Michele Comitini All bets are off. The catalyst that ignites Rossi's powerful hot reactions is now well known and proven: KrIvIt. Really? Good heavens! I missed that little tidbit. Can you cite references or links that describe Rossi's secret sauce? Inquiring minds want to know.

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Rossi wrote: WE WILL MEASURE THE ENERGY TAKING THE DELTA T OF THE WATER, THE WATER, THE WATER, NOT OF THE STEAM NOT OF THE STEAM, NOT OF THE STEAM, THEREFORE THE ISSUE OF THE QUALITY OF THE STEAM HAS ABSOLUTELY NOT IMPORTANCE, BECAURE WE DO NOT MEASURE THE ENERGY FROM THE STEAM !!! WE

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Nevertheless, Rossi continuing to describe Krivit as a snake is not doing himself any favors. IMO, to constantly reveal such an incredibly raw emotional side of himself to the general public, particularly in the midst of trying to convince others as to the accuracy of his controversial scientific

Aw: Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 29.09.2011 16:21 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news) Nevertheless, Rossi continuing to describe Krivit as a snake is not doing

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello Group, More from Rossi on NASA: 1) How is it going with the 1MW plant? is it completed? 2) Did you invited people from NASA to the October 6th test? 3) Is NASA the big customer of your first 1MW plant? Dear Alessandro Casali: 1- It will be

Re: Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Peter: ... There seems to (hostile) competition between Piantelli group and Rossi. Krivit in his website gives the impression to be independent, but his sponsor is unknown and he seems to prefer the piantelli group over others. You seem to be speculating, and therefore insinuating

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 29.09.2011 17:29, schrieb OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson: From Peter: ... There seems to (hostile) competition between Piantelli group and Rossi. Krivit in his website gives the impression to be independent, but his sponsor is unknown and he seems to prefer the piantelli group over others.

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Peter Heckert S. V. Johnson When I was still a BoD member for Krivit's NET organization his sponser(s), at least during the time when I was still a BoD, seemed pretty independently- minded to me. I could be wrong, but I doubt Krivit's sponsorship [I meant sponser(s)] would have changed

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 29.09.2011 19:12, schrieb OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson: From Peter Heckert S. V. Johnson When I was still a BoD member for Krivit's NET organization his sponser(s), at least during the time when I was still a BoD, seemed pretty independently- minded to me. I could be wrong, but I doubt

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 29-9-2011 16:21, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: Nevertheless, Rossi continuing to describe Krivit as a snake is not doing himself any favors. IMO, to constantly reveal such an incredibly raw emotional side of himself to the general public, particularly in the midst of trying to

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:32 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: From: Michele Comitini All bets are off. The catalyst that ignites Rossi's powerful hot reactions is now well known and proven: KrIvIt. Really? Good heavens! I missed that little tidbit. Can

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-29 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Terry seZ: ... Krivit is certainly causing a reaction within Rossi.  AAMOF, it appears to me that AR is on the verge of a meltdown. Do you notice a hint of desperation in AR's writings of late? LOL. I completely missed the original joke. ...er the joke is on me. Regards Steven Vincent

RE: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-28 Thread Robert Leguillon
My two cents: As was previously theorized, Rossi may have really been onto something. Unfortunately, when the reaction occurs, it is difficult to keep stable; it runs away and needs to be quenched. If you recall, the Defkalion rumors centered around a nonpayment from Defkalion until Rossi

Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)

2011-09-28 Thread Terry Blanton
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: But, he only really achieved stability when it WASN'T WORKING.  By failing to do proper calorimetry and use proper controls, he'd fooled himself into thinking it's running smoothly when it isn't running at