or duplicated.
It remains an engaging topic for speculation.
Mike Carrell
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 2:16 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Understanding BLP: Chapter Two
The cavitation experiments by LeClair show that water subjected
That's gotta be the Griggs Hydrosonic Pump, still in production I think.
From: Mike Carrell [mailto:mi...@medleas.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:23 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Understanding BLP: Chapter Two
Years ago an industrial water heater was marketed
a lot
easier unless we happened to be too close to one of those devices exhibiting
too much gain! :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Jan 23, 2014 1:23 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Understanding BLP: Chapter Two
Years
*As far as I know, the physics/chemistry of the Papp device has not been
clarified or duplicated.*
For your information, the explosive expansion of hydrogen, helium, and
mixed noble gases have been demonstrated by Both Bob Rohner and Russ Gries
among others in a cylinder/piston format. Russ has
Russ Gries has publically documented his experiment on the spark induced
explosive expansion of hydrogen on YouTube. Under the new U.S. patent laws,
doesn’t that give Russ the first to reveal patent rights to that process?
Papp has the water IP rights tied down back in the 70's.
That gives
I am no patent atty but I think the US Law changed last year from first to
disclose to first to file, or something to that effect...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Russ Gries has publically documented his experiment on the spark induced
explosive
FYI
Implementation of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
The U.S. patent system has granted patents to the person who could
substantiate that they were the “first to invent.” Fairly liberal
mechanisms existed that created a “grace period” allowing inventors to
receive patents from applications
[mailto:cheme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:09 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Understanding BLP: Chapter Two
I am no patent atty but I think the US Law changed last year from first to
disclose to first to file, or something to that effect...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3
.
Igniting hydrogen with a spark in itself is not patentable: What Mills is
doing is much more than that.
Mike Carrell
*From:* ChemE Stewart [mailto:cheme...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:09 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Understanding BLP: Chapter Two
Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Understanding BLP: Chapter Two
Mike, do you believe that those older cavitation devices operated at over
unity? My main concern is that it is so difficult to make accurate
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Understanding BLP: Chapter Two
That's gotta be the Griggs Hydrosonic Pump, still in production I think.
From: Mike Carrell [mailto:mi...@medleas.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:23 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Understanding BLP: Chapter Two
The cavitation experiments by LeClair show that water subjected to plasma
cooling will produce nanoparticles of solid water formed from cooling water
plasma.
These small crystalline particles are the active agent in many water based
nanoplasmonic LENR reactions including cavitation.
I believe
Nanoparticle formation, superatoms, and Rydberg matter are an important
subfield in chemistry. Mills, being a master chemist, should have been
familiar with this science and should not have invented his own imaginary
field of chemistry. Nanoparticles and their properties and application can
13 matches
Mail list logo
