Hi Horace, sorry for the late response, my comments below.
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does* dissolve the
Pd
surface,
On Feb 9, 2010, at 2:09 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Hi Horace, sorry for the late response, my comments below.
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
Two things to consider: (1)
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
If lattice resonance is a factor, then some depth may be required to build
up a strong enough resonance effect that the mechanism can operate.
(analogous to adding more dipoles to a TV antenna)
Hi Robin,
Lattice resonance and depth below the
On 02/08/2010 11:41 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
I have lost the citation from a few weeks ago that claimed that below a
threshold of about 10 nm, the expected blackbody frequency is upshifted for
nanostructures, in general.
If I understand you, and if this is true, then it's a violation of the
2010/2/2 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
...
A single
SRI experiment has been published that made strong efforts to recover all
the helium, and it came up with, as I recall, about 25 MeV.
That experiment was discussed in the paper submitted by Hagelstein,
McKubre et al to the DOE in
Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does* dissolve
the Pd surface, and (2) previous work has shown that helium
production takes place near but below the surface (order of microns),
while tritium production tends to take place on or very close to the
surface (within a few
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does* dissolve the Pd
surface,
True, but extremely slowly I believe. A Pd anode is known to dissolve
relatively fast in acidic electrolytes such as D2SO4, but I don't
think that's what they used.
On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does*
dissolve the Pd
surface,
True, but extremely slowly I believe. A Pd anode is known to dissolve
relatively fast in acidic electrolytes
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 7 Feb 2010 05:52:36 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
No, most of the 4He reactions occur sub-surface. What do you think
produces a volcano? A surface reaction? The typical 4He produced
by CF does not have MeV kinetic energy, and is not surface produced.
If
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'm correcting this comment as to the Violante data using more
accurate numbers as provided by Violante and inferred from that.
Provided where? When? To you in private correspondence, or did you
find the data elsewhere?
I can poke around and see if I have some
10 matches
Mail list logo
