You've got a hypothesis: A specific configuration, presented as treatment
of experimental subjects, produces an effect -- even if only an enhancement
of the placebo effect.
The null hypothesis upon which to base the control experiment: Even though
a placebo effect may be present and in fact
...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 10:57 am
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Any experimenters, aether theorists here?
John,
I think Ed Storm coined the NAE as a Nuclear Active
environment.. not really defining how the lattice geometry does what
You do a double blind trial by automating the process and covering the
screen.
Program a computer to randomly display one of your images or a blank
screen every minute of so. The computer will keep a record of what was
displayed during each time interval.
During the interval test subjects will
I think you should also do a version where passive images are printed
paper and kept in sealed envelopes.
A video image is an active image in the sense that it requires an
electrical power source to be present. As a result a video image might
channel or focus EM fields and radiation in such a way
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:57 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
So, let me ask you again for an acceptable control experiment but in
different terms:
What sort of picture does your theory predict will be very similar to the
experimental treatment picture, but lack the essential
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:57 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
So, let me ask you again for an acceptable control experiment but in
different terms:
What sort of picture does your theory predict will be
Do you have any idea whether the inactive one would frequently be made
active by variations in display setttings?
Not very likely.
There are various difficulties, not that it should stop you but you should
be aware of them.
Aetheric energy can couple over large distances, additionally it
John,
Eye candy, vertigo and mood alteration are certainly examples of light patterns
affecting the brain through optical stimulation but I would not qualify this as
engineering the ether. It is an interesting subject but I disagree with you
titling this subject as based on ether theory.
This is not made to effect the eye or brain.
It works with eyes closed.
As do images that look like a solid colour to the eyes, they still work
(due to subtle colour variation the eye can't make out).
If you put the 'shooter' image on screen and feel the right side of the
screen from the back or
Let me add that I also know that this has nothing to do with visual effects
because this is only one form I have used to effect the aether.
It started when I made a coil a bit over a year ago, I could very very
faintly at first feel something in my hand.
It was near the level of imagination at
What would be an acceptable control experiment that could distinguish
between placebo and real effect? What about double blind?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me add that I also know that this has nothing to do with visual
effects because this
It is funny that not a single new person has reported even testing the
images.
Both Jones Bennee and Gibson Elliot had tested and reported back with
positive results before I posted this to Vortex.
So before everyone tries to debunk it, find fault.
How about actually testing it and reporting back
Running a control experiment is debunking?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:57 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
It is funny that not a single new person has reported even testing the
images.
Both Jones Bennee and Gibson Elliot had tested and reported back with
positive results before I
You know, John, if I were an amazing Randi type, aside from the fact that I
wouldn't be caught dead posting to vortex-l, I would propose my own control
experiment rather than asking you what you considered to be an acceptable
control experiment.
If I were the Amazing Randi, my control experiment
First off, thank you for at least considering this.
Yes I a bit frustrated that no one new has reported even trying these
images, but I did not mean to show any disrespect.
There is an issue I didn't really want to get to yet, but I think it must
be considered if we are going to get into the
-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Any experimenters, aether theorists here?
It seems to me that the idea of an ether is a useful one, albeit not in the
form people were anticipating early last century. I believe they expected to
find experimental evidence of a general movement
John,
I think Ed Storm coined the NAE as a Nuclear Active
environment.. not really defining how the lattice geometry does what it does
but rather just defining the area where it occurs.. these hot spots do
sometimes produce trace amounts of nuclear ash but not enough to account
:57 am
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Any experimenters, aether theorists here?
John,
I think Ed Storm coined the NAE as a Nuclear Active
environment.. not really defining how the lattice geometry does what it does
but rather just defining the area where it occurs.. these hot
It seems to me that the idea of an ether is a useful one, albeit not in the
form people were anticipating early last century. I believe they expected
to find experimental evidence of a general movement in a specific direction
if an ether existed. I see no reason to think that an either needs to
19 matches
Mail list logo
