RE: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

I wish you were attending, Ron – but as everyone knows: THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC DEMONSTRATION – attendance is being carefully controlled. Even strong supporters of BLP have been rejected for invitations, simply because they are scientists. Mills does not want to address the problem of

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

d'you know where it is going to be held? On 28 January 2016 at 19:20, Ron Kita wrote: > Hmmm: > http://brilliantlightpower.com/invitational-public-demonstration/ > > Ron Kita, Chiralex > Doylestown, PA 50 miles to Mills > -- --- http://twitter.com/esaruoho //

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

"Invitational public demonstration" is a contradiction of terms. If it is invitational, it is not public. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

I hope that Bill Good is still with BLP. Many many years ago...we had a few telephone conversations..pleasant. Ad astra, Ron the company may have been tied to ThermocoreFranklin and Marshall U. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Craig Haynie wrote: > On Thu,

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 09:30 -0800, Jones Beene wrote: > Mills does not want to address the problem of having no verifiable > data to share. > As we've seen from previous attempts, there is no such thing as verifiable data at a public demonstration. Everything will be questioned, and nothing can

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity

OK Axil, I am glad you see that there is no disservice. Maybe they do provide theoretical statements that are cockeyed. From reading Mats Lewan's book one can at least find three reasons why.: 1. There is no patent law that protects anything without a big bag of money to defend the patent, but a

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity

I do not think Rossi and Mills do a disservice to LENR because they raise money. They dishonor LENR because of the cockeyed theories that purports to describe their systems. Science is put off by this theoretical farce and it has been for 25 years. I hope that DGT will serve the cause of LENR as

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity

BlackLight Power is about to be swept into the dustbin of history. In a year or less, a workable LENR product will be demonstrated as a preproduction prototype. This should cut the legs out from under their investor base who have been so cruelly abused over these many years and that has propped

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity Using Photovoltaic Conversion of the Millions of Watts of Brilliant Plasma Formed by the Reaction of Water to a More Stabl

1 billion watts for how long? 1 picosecond :P? 2014-04-04 8:16 GMT-03:00 Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com: Here we go, again: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140403006389/en/BlackLight-Power-Announces-Sustained-Production-Electricity-Photovoltaic -- Daniel Rocha - RJ

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity Using Photovoltaic Conversion of the Millions of Watts of Brilliant Plasma Formed by the Reaction of Water to a More Stabl

Same old incommensurability noisehttps://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg89595.html . Gads this stuff is disgusting. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: 1 billion watts for how long? 1 picosecond :P? 2014-04-04 8:16 GMT-03:00 Mark Jurich

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity

hello all, I am posting my comment here but it is several treads, which I am commenting on. i think as we all are trying to promote LENR. We are doing a lot of disservice to or case by being negative to the guys who has raised the funds, i have read half the ebook about an Andrea Rossi and i

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity Using Photovoltaic Conversion of the Millions of Watts of Brilliant Plasma Formed by the Reaction of Water to a More Stabl

Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com wrote: Here we go, again: Well said! It is kind of hilarious. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity Using Photovoltaic Conversion of the Millions of Watts of Brilliant Plasma Formed by the Reaction of Water to a More Stabl

Blacklight lost the limelight to Rossi. Now it remains to be seen if Rossi deserved the limelight. On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com wrote: Here we go, again: Well said! It is kind of hilarious. - Jed

RE: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Sustained Production of Electricity

LOL. This stuff should have come out on April 1. A small photovoltaic panel converting millions of watts of light from a seam welder ? That's hilarious. Whether Rossi has the stolen the limelight or not, this is about the most absurd BS on the planet. It looks like an act of total

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power

below is a partial transcript of Shelby Brewer speaking at some presentation: http://seekingalpha.com/article/27312-commodore-applied-technologies-red-chip-conference-presentation-transcript The technology side, we have a process called Solvated

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces First Commercial License in Europe

They are starting to play in the big leagues. Quoting the press release: Cranbury, NJ (March 23, 2010)­BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced its seventh commercial license agreement, and first in Europe with GEOENERGIE SpA, Energy Subsidiary of Geogreen. In a non-exclusive

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces First Commercial License in Europe

Any hints as to what, if anything, the license cost? So far there's been no clear indication that any power company has actually *bought* a license from BLP, as far as I know. (I'll be happy to be corrected on this.) On 04/01/2010 10:54 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: They are starting to play in the

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces First Commercial License in Europe

Agreements like these (unproved technology) generally involve a low up front licensing fee with a significant per unit royalty. I would guess it to be something like Tesla's agreement with Westinghouse. If it was truly free and you can sell a 10 kilowatt hours for a buck, it would not be

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces First Commercial License in Europe

At 10:49 AM 4/1/2010, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: FYI: I'm surprised Mr. Carrell has not yet alerted us to a recent BlackLight Power announcement: BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces First [seventh over-all] Commercial License in Europe with GEOENERGIE SpA, Energy Subsidiary of Geogreen

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:14:29 -0500: Hi, [snip] My guess is that if you click on the dot out of curiosity you get infected. Just a curiosity. I have one of my google news alerts set for Blacklight Power. Several days ago I started

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

Infected by the virus of the mind that makes you press the button again and again... Except for blowing the world up it's harmless... On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:14:29 -0500: Hi,

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:14:29 -0500: Hi, [snip] My guess is that if you click on the dot out of curiosity you get infected. Doubt it (but I'm not going to try it!). Rather, it looks like it plays a

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

I've never heard of an infectious Flash file so I don't think it's actually dangerous. I clicked the dot about 1000 times. It's a funny little program. If my computer became infected, it's not obvious.

RE: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

FYI, I think most who have commented on this issue have missed a specific point, no pun intended. Why are there different URL sites all sporting the same red dot function? None of my other google alerts appear infected. This is specific. Only in regards to Google news alerts concerning

RE: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

I googled press the red button. All sorts of hits came up - most pointing to the same annoying red button app. It appears to be a harmless app. Here are some Googled searched comments: http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=9644

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:26 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: Does anyone else have a google alert for Blacklight Power? What have they gotten for the past several days concerning BLP? I assume they have not gotten it... or have they gotten it as well?

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Terry Blantonhohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:14 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnsonorionwo...@charter.net wrote: Just a curiosity. Reminds me of this MP3 psychiatric answering machine. Terry THIS one:

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:14 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnsonorionwo...@charter.net wrote: Just a curiosity. Reminds me of this MP3 psychiatric answering machine. Terry

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

More likely they have hacked into GoDaddy: myftpsite.net = [ 63.64.164.96 ] (Asked whois.godaddy.com:43 about myftpsite.net) Registrant: Deerfield.com Registered through: GoDaddy.com Inc. http://www.godaddy.com Domain Name: MYFTPSITE.NET Domain servers in listed order:

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power, the annoying RED DOT!, Someone messing around

I've gotten the same bogus Blacklight Power emails from three separate independent Email accounts. All the same bogus URLs. Apparently, others have gotten the same bogus email alerts as well. Most of the analysis expressed so far seems to describe various symptoms. What is causing the symptoms?

RE: [Vo]:Blacklight Power revamps their web site

The power gain is very real but the theory is very wrong and people are looking at the gas atoms when they should be looking at the catalyst. Fractional states do not exist in 4D and the hydrino is unphysical but in the same way as the Twin Paradox from physics 101 is unphysical! The

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power revamps their web site

OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: If you haven't already done so, check out BlackLight Power's web site. http://www.blacklightpower.com/ Besides a new face, new stuff reported on. I notice they've got another replication from the Rowan team. No links to published articles on

RE: [Vo]:Blacklight Power revamps their web site

Yes, the big announcement came out yesterday. Validation using off the shelf materials by Rowan. Sorted by relevance Sort by date http://news.google.com/news/search?um=1ned=ushl=enq=black+light+powercf=allscoring=n Sort by date with duplicates included

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power revamps their web site

From the recent BLP press release at: http://www.blacklightpower.com/Press%20Releases/BlackLightPowerPhysicsGrandSlamFINAL081209.htm http://tinyurl.com/q2dxos -- Excerpt: “The advanced version of the solid fuel is very efficient at liberating energy from forming

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power revamps their web site

-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 1:00 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power revamps their web site From the recent BLP press release at: http://www.blacklightpower.com/Press%20Releases/BlackLightPowerPhysicsGrandSlamFINAL081209.htm http://tinyurl.com/q2dxos

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power revamps their web site

In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:00:12 -0500: Hi, [snip] From http://www.blacklightpower.com/introguide.shtml#2 The solid-fuel chemistry has the important feature that it's regenerable using methods such as molten-salt electrolysis. An advanced version

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July 30, 2009

On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Mike Carrell wrote: Mills has pledged to post progess as possible, and he has done so. It is probable that as BLP progesses on their current path, a firestorm of criticism and opposition may emerge, and BLP must be prepared for it. Remember the story of the

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July 30, 2009

, August 02, 2009 2:41 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July 30, 2009 On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Mike Carrell wrote: Mills has pledged to post progess as possible, and he has done so. It is probable that as BLP progesses on their current path

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July 30, 2009

But, Steven, all that is decidedly ON TOPIC: http://amasci.com/weird/wvort.html The Vortex-L list was originally created for discussions of professional research into fluid vortex/cavitation devices which exhibit anomalous energy effects (ie: the inventions of Schaeffer, Huffman, Griggs, and

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July 30, 2009

Message - From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July 30, 2009 I chased the link and didn't get anywhere; it would not open for me. Could you summarize

RE: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July 30, 2009

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces 6th commercial license July 30, 2009 MC: You won't get much satisfaction from the press release itself. As a BLP watcher, I can offer some unofficial background. The positinve part is that there are now six corporate entities who have

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power stuff

Downloaded fine here. It's a 130-page PDF document (80 blank pages). Do you want me to send you the PDF? Mark Jordan On 16 Aug 2008 at 19:41, Jones Beene wrote: --- Hi Robin, Going by the old paper I have (Anomalous Argon-Hydrogen-Strontium Discharge) we are

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power stuff

-- Robin Assuming 10%, then the light output would be 2.46 W for pure H2 (taken from the table). To get a flux of 2 microwatt/cm^2, one would have to measure at a distance of about 3 m from the reaction. Not at all. You are apparently assuming the full cm^2 of the chip is being

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

After reading the decision of the patent examiner, my impression is that the patent was rejected for good reason. The rejection argument is not that the theory is wrong but that Mills is trying to patent a theory and its application to calculating electron states. This would be like having a

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

- Original Message - From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:40 AM Subject: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO snip What I'd like to know is whether UK IPO's final decision was due to a difference in

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the calculation of electron states via software simulations. Is this latest battle related to Randy's Millsian Molecular Modeling endeavors, or is this a follow-up to recent

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

Can theories be copyrighted? Harry On 12/5/2008 4:37 PM, OrionWorks wrote: Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the calculation of electron states via software simulations. Is this latest battle related

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

- Original Message - From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP would attempt to patent

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

Howdy Mike, And thus we gain another glimpse of the new century strategies being used to capture revenue streams derived from intellectual property... or should I say properties. Actually the field remains open to a new legimate form of pirating ownership before discovery. hmmm Google