You're just not spelling it right: F-I-Z-Z-I-X ⚛
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:46 AM H LV wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:59 PM Robin
> wrote:
>
>> In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:31:04 -0400:
>> Hi Harry,
>>
>> Are you getting bored because of the low level of
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:59 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:31:04 -0400:
> Hi Harry,
>
> Are you getting bored because of the low level of activity on Vortex? :)
>
>
Physics needs some fizzle.
Harry
In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:31:04 -0400:
Hi Harry,
Are you getting bored because of the low level of activity on Vortex? :)
I wrote:
> Count Rumfordd would say on the nightside the Earth is cooled by
> frigorific rays from space, whereby the frigorific rays
> slow the movements of atoms. He had this interesting conception of
> radiation as being capable of either heating or cooling, i.e. accelerating
> or dampening
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:22 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to H LV's message of Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:13:59 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >She isn't interested in how the heat is conveyed to the surface. Her
> >argument is that it can`t be discounted.
>
> Whether or not it can be discounted depends on how
In reply to H LV's message of Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:13:59 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>She isn't interested in how the heat is conveyed to the surface. Her
>argument is that it can`t be discounted.
Whether or not it can be discounted depends on how much of it there is. One
would need to estimate the
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:14 AM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to H LV's message of Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:52:03 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >The heat flux from the Earth has been estimated, and she agrees with
> >the value, but it is way too small to contribute to global warming
> >according to the standard
In reply to H LV's message of Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:52:03 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The heat flux from the Earth has been estimated, and she agrees with
>the value, but it is way too small to contribute to global warming
>according to the standard view of heat and radiation which is why it is
>ignored by
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 10:35 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to H LV's message of Sun, 13 Sep 2020 22:23:13 -0400:
> Hi Harry,
> [snip]
> >As I scan Zoe's various posts and her responses to her critics it seems
> she
> >insists that heat and radiation are related but also maintains that they
> >are
In reply to H LV's message of Sun, 13 Sep 2020 22:23:13 -0400:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
>As I scan Zoe's various posts and her responses to her critics it seems she
>insists that heat and radiation are related but also maintains that they
>are not equivalent or convertible. She maintains that a body can
As I scan Zoe's various posts and her responses to her critics it seems she
insists that heat and radiation are related but also maintains that they
are not equivalent or convertible. She maintains that a body can shine
alone, but it will only shed heat as well if a relatively cooler body is
Since this involves heat flow, LENR experimenters should be able to assess
this claim.
harry
<> .
see
https://phzoe.com/2020/05/22/equating-perpendicular-planes-is-plain-nonsense/
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 6:09 PM Jones Beene wrote:
> Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> Frank Znidarsic wrote: Even Jane
Terry Blanton wrote:
Frank Znidarsic wrote: Even Jane Fonda wrote a book on climate change.
> Still looks good at 82; although, the makeup artist for G did win an
> award...
More to the point ... the China Syndrome is still a persistent meme. Some may
remember the old bumper sticker, seen on
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 3:52 PM Frank Znidarsic wrote:
> Even Jane Fonda wrote a book on climate change.
>
And she begins shooting her 7th season of "Grace & Frankie" after she loses
the 10 lbs she gained during quarentining.
https://www.prevention.com/fitness/a20686775/jane-fonda-age/
Still
Even Jane Fonda wrote a book on climate change. I'm sure she did not mention
the solution of lattice enabled nuclear reactions.
15 matches
Mail list logo
