At a minimum a replaceable cartridge needs to have an additional supply of
hydrogen - and that means a sealable connection (not something you would
necessarily trust a muppet consumer with - a lot of people don't even know
how to tighten a nut. Also if we are to believe recent speculation about
Also if it is just an extra dose of powder: How do you contain the
vacuum..? What kind of cheap and save mechanism could it be to contain
the vacuum? Or to create a new one after refueling? Or will the reactor
core completely be replaced and recycled in a factory?
Wolf
At a minimum a
You probably don't need a vacuum as the system normally runs pressurised.
After you have replaced the powder pressurise it with hydrogen and then
vent it. Repeat this several times and there will be almost no air left in
it. If the powder has been processed correctly beforehand then a short
, Jan 12, 2012 7:12 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi : customer can refill
How he has managed to do this will be very interesting to see. I can
nly imagine the whole sealed reactor assembly must be replaced and then
ecycled. The mentioned $10 does seem to be way too low a price unless
he sealed
I agree. This changes things significantly. It will be interesting
to see how this is achieved. It's simple enough to change a
cartridge with the nickel powder but how is the hydrogen taken care
of? Perhaps the whole reactor core including the hydrogen storage is
built
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY different. It is a
good development. Go Rossi Go.
It is just one more extravagant claim without one tiny shred of proof.
Hum, seems hard to do.
my point of view is that maybe it will be replacing the full core, with Ni,
H, primary cooling, and maybe electronic...
once shutdown, the reactor will be simply plumbed/pluged-out like a printer
cartridge...
it can also look like the modern anti-stealing autoradio, where
On 12-01-13 12:21 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Hum, seems hard to do.
my point of view is that maybe it will be replacing the full core,
with Ni, H, primary cooling, and maybe electronic...
once shutdown, the reactor will be simply plumbed/pluged-out like a
printer cartridge...
Good analogy.
I wonder if the $10 refill includes the self destruct mechanism or if
that's perhaps an extra cost option.
In reply to Energy Liberator's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:04:56 +:
Hi,
[snip]
I agree. This changes things significantly. It will be interesting to see how
this is achieved. It's simple enough to change a cartridge with the nickel
powder but how is the hydrogen taken care of? Perhaps
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY different. It is
a good development. Go Rossi Go.
AG
On 1/13/2012 9:57 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
January 12th, 2012 at 5:51 PM
Andrea Rossi
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=11#comment-168783
Dear Mattia Zirzi:
At 03:46 PM 1/12/2012, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY different.
It is a good development. Go Rossi Go.
It must be an integrated Nickel+Hydrogen cartridge.
How he has managed to do this will be very interesting to see. I can
only imagine the whole sealed reactor assembly must be replaced and then
recycled. The mentioned $10 does seem to be way too low a price unless
the sealed reactor is a throw away item (throw away into the recycle
trash bin).
13 matches
Mail list logo
