It doesn't matter much what either candidate says, they will follow the
advice of DoE or NASA. DoE in particular STILL don't think ELNR
happens. At least that is their current official position.
See what I wrote here
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Mitt Romney has made a comment, about as ignorant is you can get, about
cold fusion that is, despite its ignorance, a positive comment.
That's a TERRIBLE reason to vote for Romney! I am sure he will do nothing
for cold fusion if he wins. Neither will
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/24/1135928/-More-Mitt-Romney-science-He-believes-University-of-Utah-solved-cold-fusion
The Jed Report
by Jed Lewison http://www.dailykos.com/user/Jed%20Lewison
[image: Mad
Another angle on this I just realized was Neocon insularity:
If there is any group of people inside the beltway that is capable of
blocking out reality and forging ahead with whatever agenda they want, it
is the Neocons who got the US into the recent wars over Al Queda in Iraq
and Sadam's WMDs.
There is a lot more to the Romney/U.Utah/BYU story than you acknowledge, and
none of it favorable to Romney. Voting for Romney because of Cold Fusion is a
little like voting for Alfred E. Neuman for President because you like
freckles. Except that Romney doesn't even have the freckles.
Please expand on the statement: There is a lot more to the
Romney/U.Utah/BYU story than you acknowledge, and none of it favorable to
Romney.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:49 PM, de Bivort Lawrence ldebiv...@gmail.comwrote:
There is a lot more to the Romney/U.Utah/BYU story than you acknowledge,
Some comfort for those who support Obama:
Intrade.com has his odds of reelection increasing as the night progresses.
He now stands at 70% odds.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:49 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I've decided to vote for Mitt Romney and enthusiastically recommend that
7 matches
Mail list logo
