In reply to thomas malloy's message of Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:17:27
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>I think that a shrunken deuterium should be called a dydrino. Has
[snip]
dydrino it is! :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
All SPAM goes in the trash unread.
At 9:17 AM 3/17/5, thomas malloy wrote:
>>>"Deuteron Structure" Science News May 2, 1998
>>>"To understand the interactions that determine the size and
>>>shape of an atomic nucleus, it helps to have a detailed
>>>picture of the simplest possible combination: a proton bound
>>>to a neutron. Kn
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:59:52
-0800:
Robin van Spaandonk posted;
>OK, let me then qualify the preceding statement in this way:
Oppenheimer-Phillips stripping, if it is low-energy
spallation, could only be mediated by a photon which is not
>easily detectable, in o
In reply to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s message of Wed, 16 Mar
2005 22:18:13 +:
Hi,
[snip]
>Not that I?m attempting to derail the on-going discussion but hasn?t it also
>been occasionally speculated that hydrinos (assuming they do exist) floating
>about in outer space might help explain where 90%
> From: Robin van Spaandonk
...
> Riddle: What is very small, weighs 2 amu, and
> carries a single positive charge?
> Answer: A deuterium nucleus.or is it a
> severely shrunken hydrino molecular ion? :)
> Could that be the true nature of some deuterons?
> [snip]
>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van S
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:59:52
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>The interesting thing is that the operative reaction is
>108Pd + n --> 109Pd --> 109Ag + energy (beta decay).
Alternatively:
108Pd + Hydrino -> 109Ag directly + shrunken electron carrying
away fusion energy? (I hav
Jones,
Its true Oppie took his licks for being an independent
cuss, however, our Madame Curie' had her moments also.
Interesting insight into his " obscure" work,
perhaps some youngster is lurking in the vortexian lair that will pick
up on your thoughts.
There are several youngsters at T
Oops, again. Needless to say, long quick postings often
produce many errors which can seldom be corrected in a
single post:
"the effective distance between the two bosons"
"bosons" should read as "fermions"
Oops. Needless to say, long quick postings often produce
many errors:
To wit:
>The real difference from all other nuclei is that
> the effective distance between the two bosons, not to
> mention the low electric charge (cause and effect) -
which
> makes the D nucleus *loosely bound. * Heisenberg's
9 matches
Mail list logo
