Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 15:41 13/01/2005 -0500, Harry wrote:
All this flows from _your_ force analysis of orbital motion. I think it is a
mistaken analysis because it is based on an analogy between orbital motion
and a body in a centrifuge. A body orbits the earth because it
At 15:41 13/01/2005 -0500, Harry wrote:
All this flows from _your_ force analysis of orbital motion. I think it is a
mistaken analysis because it is based on an analogy between orbital motion
and a body in a centrifuge. A body orbits the earth because it is in
free fall. There is simply no
At 08:29 AM 1/14/2005 -0800, you wrote:
A body undergoing a constant acceleration at 90 deg to its direction of travel
will travel in a circle. Radius of the circular path is determined by a
combination of the bodies velocity and the magnitude of the force. (Sorry
Horace, I can't take the time
Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:05 pm 12-01-05 -0500, you wrote:
Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:24 pm 12-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
Your protons and neutrons are not like the protons and neutrons
known to physics. Neutrons and protons both have inertia and gravity,
At 03:42 am 13-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
Do thing 1 and thing 2 come with a thing-force to keep them together?
By George, (s)he's got it, Pickering. By George, (s)he's got it. ;^)
Of course they do. That was implicit in the analogy.
It's no good having a sail and a hull if they haven't
Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:42 am 13-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
Do thing 1 and thing 2 come with a thing-force to keep them together?
By George, (s)he's got it, Pickering. By George, (s)he's got it. ;^)
Of course they do. That was implicit in the analogy.
It's no good
At 06:05 pm 12-01-05 -0500, you wrote:
Grimer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:24 pm 12-01-05 -0500, Harry wrote:
Your protons and neutrons are not like the protons and neutrons
known to physics. Neutrons and protons both have inertia and gravity,
but for the sake of argument you have
7 matches
Mail list logo
