Re: Finsrud device

2005-05-05 Thread thomas malloy
Public wrote: Have you seen this?: PM of the first kind using static magnets goes down to the bedrock of all physics for the last couple centuries and dynamites it. Yawn, While a PM machine would be significant, I fail to see where it would produce much energy, enough to charge a

Re: Finsrud device

2005-05-05 Thread William Beaty
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Mike Carrell wrote: This is actually not new; the ball has been happily rolling around for years, to my knowledge. It is on display in a public museum. Someone who first posted the Finsrud articles mentioned that the machine wears out and must be taken down for adjustments.

re: finsrud device

2005-05-05 Thread Stephen R. Lawrence
I think if I were concealing anything, I'd put 3 solenoids in the base to inject momentum into the swinging pendulums at the relevant rate, powered by similarly concealed battery. From: Stephen R. Lawrence, 8 Supanee Court, French's Road, Cambridge, England, CB4 3LB. Tel/Fax +44 1223 564373

Re: Finsrud device

2005-05-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mike Carrell wrote: The testatika machine has been supplying power to the Methernitha colony for years also; many have seen it a documented it and it is conveniently ignored... All the documentation of this device that I have seen proves absolutely nothing. It consists of hearsay, blurry

Re: Finsrud device

2005-05-04 Thread Mike Carrell
Jed wrote: Mike Carrell wrote: The testatika machine has been supplying power to the Methernitha colony for years also; many have seen it a documented it and it is conveniently ignored... All the documentation of this device that I have seen proves absolutely nothing. It consists of