The elevator cable doesn't have to be electrically conductive.
Michel
2010/1/25 Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com:
best link ive found so far.
http://www.data4science.net/essays.php?EssayID=850
hmm, i think its the same one you are talking about. I THOUGHT there
was another one
2010/1/25 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
By the way, I think Bill Gates (2004) was right and spam has been largely
eliminated.
Jed, I see you use Gmail, have you checked the number of emails in
your spam folder? (the spams you have received in the last month if
you haven't deleted them
Earlier I wrote: Once the hypothesis of one of more deflated
electrons and a de-energized composite nucleus comes into play the
situation with regard to spin and other constraints becomes more
complex, especially if there are numerous deflated (negative energy)
electrons in the nucleus
From Michel:
Jed, I see you use Gmail, have you checked the number of emails in
your spam folder? (the spams you have received in the last month if
you haven't deleted them manually). Mine contains more than 1400
spams, so maybe it would be more accurate to say that spam is less
problematic
Even a non conductive material will, if the voltage difference is
great enough, have surface effects that can cause plasma discharges
(think making plasma balls in the microwave with burnt matches.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com wrote:
The elevator cable
Michel Jullian wrote:
Jed, I see you use Gmail, have you checked the number of emails in
your spam folder?
Maybe 5 per day. I don't check often. I have only found real mail
there are few times. I would say spam has gone from being Very
Annoying to being a minor problem you have to deal with
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY
World's Physicists Complete Study Of Physics
JANUARY 14, 2010 | ISSUE 46•02
HARIMA, JAPAN—Saying that there was no more knowledge to acquire about
the physical nature of the universe, the International Union of Pure
and Applied Physics announced Monday that it had concluded
Ironically, this was the only VO message in my spam folder of about 30
total in the past month.
Hey Monteverde, the Food Network says Hawaiians love spam, like spam
omelette's, etc.
Terry
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:50 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
From
http://www.bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article088.htm
Wikipedia Doesn't Like Me ...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
Saturday, January 2nd, 2010
Wikipedia's General Counsel, Mike Godwin, is sending me nasty emails.
Apparently he doesn't like me telling people how bad
Can't blame them when someone is spending their time teaching people how to sue
Wikipedia. The afflicted need to realize that if they depend on soemthing like
Wikipedia as anything other than just another resource, they will make
mistakes. To sue someone over your own mistakes is a major cop
Steve Krivit posted the following:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2010/ARL/ARL-Agenda.shtmlhttp://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2010/ARL/ARL-Agenda.shtml
This is good news. I have been hearing about other small seminars
like this at various places, mainly in the military.
-
At 08:50 AM 1/26/2010, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
http://blogs.msdn.com/tzink/archive/2010/01/25/spam-is-solved-we-can-all-go-home-now.aspx
http://tinyurl.com/ylj42d5
I would love some comments on this article.
Okay, here goes!
The article describes an interesting
Steve Krivit posted the following:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2010/ARL/ARL-Agenda.shtmlhttp://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2010/ARL/ARL-Agenda.shtml
This is good news. I have been hearing about other small seminars
like this at various places, mainly in the military.
-
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:05:35 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Ironically, this was the only VO message in my spam folder of about 30
total in the past month.
Hey Monteverde, the Food Network says Hawaiians love spam, like spam
omelette's, etc.
Terry
SPAM - SPurious
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:13 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
SPAM - SPurious Advertising Material.
Also SPiced hAM:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE
T
I agree with this guy Bolen that many Wikipedia articles are
anti-intellectual, but filing suits against Wikipeida is WAY over the
line. That is not how to respond! Just ignore it. Don't mess with free speech.
In a few cases vandals at Wikipedia defamed people. I think they have
put in place
On 01/26/2010 05:27 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
These people are extremists but so are the editors of the Scientific
American, the Executive Director of the AIP and many others. Filing
lawsuits would not improve this situation even if it were not a
violation of free speech.
They're not the
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
THAT is what Free Speech is about -- not about your right to get
your message
out on the Internet free of interference from private individuals
who disagree with you.
However, private individuals and corporations cannot interfere with
web sites they do not own.
As they say, You vote with your dollar.
I used to be a regular contributor to Wikipedia; but, have reduced my
contributions significantly because there seem to be people who spend
their day full time defending their positions. I can only wonder who
is paying them.
It is no longer me.
T
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
HARIMA, JAPAN—Saying that there was no more knowledge to
acquire about
the physical nature of the universe, the International
Union of Pure
and Applied Physics announced Monday that it had concluded
the
scientific study of
At 02:27 PM 1/26/2010, you wrote:
Just ignore it. Don't mess with free speech.
I am editing papers for a REAL encyclopedia. Every once in a while authors
will submit papers that include references to Wikipedia. I tell them all
that such references are unacceptable. End of story.
s
21 matches
Mail list logo
